October 31, 2004
A November to remember
As if the post-Blakely world of sentencing has not been exciting enough, looking ahead there are reason to believe (and fear?) that November will be the best sentencing month ever. (Perhaps you can tell from my description that I am a big fan of Richard Scarry and all of his best ever books.)
Hyperbole aside, let me quickly detail just a few red letter dates in the month ahead:
Monday, November 1: A date predicted by some for the handing down of Booker and Fanfan.
Tuesday, November 2: An election which will likely impact, in many large and small ways, the personnel making sentencing law and policy decisions in the state and federal systems. In addition, Californians will vote on Proposition 66, the initiative to amend California's Three Strikes Law (recently discussed here).
Monday, November 8: oral argument before the US Supreme Court in Shepard v. US, a case (discussed here) which might provide the Court a chance to speak to the continued validity and scope of the Appendi/Blakely "prior conviction" exception.
Tuesday/Wednesday, November 9-10: The Indiana Supreme Court and Washington Supreme Court hear arguments in major Blakely cases.
Tuesday, November 16: Judge Cassell's scheduled "sentencing meeting" in US v. Angelos, the mandatory minimum sentencing case (discussed here and here) in which Judge Cassell asked for briefing on constitutional issues.
Tuesday/Wednesday, November 16-17: As noted here, the US Sentencing Commission plans for a public hearing which is likely to discuss Blakely (and Booker and Fanfan?). More details when available.
Before the end of November: I predict Booker and Fanfan will be handed down and the third Federal Sentencing Reporter issue on Blakely will go to press. (Details on earlier FSR Blakely issues can be found here and here.)
October 31, 2004 at 09:52 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A November to remember:
I'm posing the following question for my brother who is serving time in a Federal prison right now in Missouri. Sorry, I tried to e-mail you personally, but was unsuccessful:
What is the proper avenue for relief following Dretke v. Hadley, May 3, 2004 and Blakely v. Washington, 6/24/2004 to address actual innocence of the conviction, or of the enhanced sentence if they were not addressed on direct appeal or 28 USC Section 2255?
Example: If the indictment fails to state or charge a known federal crime or offense defined by Congress, is the defendant actually innocent to qualify for relief via 28 USC 2241 (a)(2)(c)(3) in the place of confinement in the 8th Circuit of Missouri?
Posted by: Marcie | Oct 31, 2004 6:08:23 PM
2004 TERM OPINIONS OF THE COURT link up now.
Do not know how long this has been up but the link to recent opinions on the main pages still goes to the 2003 session.
You can get to this one by the opinions tab then hitting the latest opinions link. Noting is post there yet......
Posted by: Jeff Wood | Nov 1, 2004 10:48:19 AM