November 9, 2004
AG Ashcroft resigns
I suspect we will see stories in the days ahead about Ashcroft's legacy, and I suspect most of those stories will focus on the "war on terror." However, from my sentencing-centric perspective, I think the Ashcroft Justice Department's perceived "war on judges" — represented most tangibly by the Feeney Amendment and its aftermath (see coverage here and here) — should be a big part of the historical story of his tenure as head of DOJ.
A number of commentators have reasonably suggested that the Blakely decision may reflect an example of the judiciary striking back, and Judge Young's opinion in Green (discussed here) and Judge Panner's opinion in Detwiler (discussed here) clearly are reactions to the view that Ashcroft's DOJ violated separation of powers principles. Thus, we might even attribute the current turmoil with (and the expected demise of) the federal sentencing guidelines to the now out-going AG.
November 9, 2004 at 08:16 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AG Ashcroft resigns:
» Ashcroft 's Legacy from Res Ipsa
Much will be written in the next few days about the Ashcroft legacy, but Ohio State law professor Douglas Berman sees sentencing law and policy as one his most (un)enduring legacies Berman speaks of the war on judges that took [Read More]
Tracked on Nov 9, 2004 10:29:08 PM
Posted by: DMarkus | Nov 9, 2004 9:23:19 PM