« Sentencing tease | Main | Blakely/Booker backup »

November 22, 2004

No double jeopardy worries in Washington

In State v. Maestas, 2004 WL 2650646 (Wash. App. Div. 1 Nov. 22, 2004), a Washington intermediate appellate court rejects, after the State conceded a Blakely problem with the imposition of an aggravated sentence based on judicial fact-finding, the defendant's assertion that "to impose such a sentence on remand would violate principles of double jeopardy." 

In a thoughtful and thorough opinion, the Maestas court explains why it concludes "that double jeopardy is not implicated in the resentencing of Maestas on remand. Should the court choose to impose an aggravated exceptional sentence following procedures that comply with the dictates of Blakely, double jeopardy does not bar doing so."

November 22, 2004 at 07:58 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No double jeopardy worries in Washington:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB