« More Blakely news from the field | Main | The recent BOP memo on Booker and Fanfan »

December 9, 2004

Some capital case buzz

With closing arguments in the penalty phase of Scott Peterson's trial being CNN.com's lead story this afternoon, it seems like a good time to span the internet for various important death penalty stories.  And there are lots of stories to note:

December 9, 2004 at 05:12 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d83437253453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Some capital case buzz:

Comments

The Chicago Trib. article made me sick to my stomach. Is this quest for a conviction at any cost typical?

It makes me wonder if some prosecutors are evil incarnate, or just amoral people who feed an evil machine in exchange for a paycheck and political clout.

Posted by: bob | Dec 9, 2004 6:01:26 PM

I agree this is horribly disconcerting and
indicates we need to carefully consider all
aspects of the death penalty.

However, at the same time I'm not convinced
anything necessarily went wrong here. Other
articles have highlight facts and
evidence that supported his conviction
beyond just the fire expert. (How about
neighbors seeing him come out of the house
before any flames, then seeing flames, then
saying oh my gosh your children, when
instead he goes to move his car, and then
is more concerned w/ his burnt record
player,and evidence of past abuse of his
wife/children, and expert testimony that he
fits the profile of a sociopath).

I guess it just seems to me that this
highlights the need to make sure that
procedures are in place to double check
sentences, especially death penalty
sentences, when there's new evidence of
this potential magnitude. But at the
same time it also seems to me that w/
all of the opportunities for appeal, and
w/ all of the other evidence against him,
maybe we should also be careful before we
reach any conclusive opinions about the
potential injustice of the system in
this particular case.

I think I'd need to review the trial
transcript before I could feel comfortable
thinking there was a problem here b/c of
all the conflicting accounts of the facts
in the various news articles but a lot of
people already have and they all sustained
the verdict which again makes me at least
a little more comfortable w/ the process.

Posted by: Anonymous Student | Dec 9, 2004 10:46:38 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB