February 13, 2005
The New Jersey Blakely saga continues
As I have detailed in posts here and here and elsewhere, the story of Blakely in New Jersey (aka the state which gave us Apprendi) is quite engaging and dynamic. Responding to the state's lament that "uncertainty regarding the effect, if any, of the Blakely opinion on [New Jersey's] ordinary term sentencing system has had a paralyzing effect on sentencing judges, defense attorneys, and prosecutors," the New Jersey Supreme Court recently agreed to review three major Appellate Division Apprendi and/or Blakely rulings on an expedited schedule.
NJ attorney Steve Sanders — who has been involved in these cases as an amicus for the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey — has been kind enough to pass along some of the briefs in these cases. For the interested reader, I have provided these briefs for downloading below. Among the notable aspects of the briefs is that the defendants say that Booker shows that Blakely is applicable to NJ's sentencing laws, while the State argues that Booker reinforces its argument that NJ's scheme is perfectly constitutional.
February 13, 2005 at 08:24 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The New Jersey Blakely saga continues:
I am an adjunct professor at Rowan University. I have been searching the codes/statutes for a statement regarding NJ's purposes for criminal punishment (sentencing). Could you please direct me to the appropriate language/statute as to NJ's position re: our main purposes for criminal punishment?
Please email me at email@example.com.
Posted by: Maria Daniel | Feb 23, 2005 10:25:13 AM