March 18, 2005
Judge Presnell speaks on 5K after Booker
In addition to being a great day for the Irish, St. Patty's Day 2005 will also go down as an amazing day for the common law of sentencing. The March 17 sentencing work of Judge Sifton in Simon and Judge Goodwin in Gray covers an array of important post-Booker issues, with Simon especially effective on crack sentencing and the purposes of punishment, and Gray doing amazing work on sentencing issues concerning burdens of proof, Crawford and ex post facto doctrine. And now we should add to the Irish stew of notable March 17 opinions the work of Florida District Judge Gregory Presnell in US v. Belvett, No. 6:04-cr-199-Orl-31DAB (MD Fla Mar. 17, 2005).
Judge Presnell made his mark on the post-Blakely sentencing world in various ways, as detailed here and here and here, and now in Belvett he addresses departures for substantial assistance under 5K1.1. Though, as with Simon and Gray, the full Belvett opinion (which can be downloaded below) merits a close read, here is a choice snippet that flows from the prosecutor's objection to Judge Presnell granting a larger 5K1.1 departure than requested by the government:
This case presents the next logical step in the government's philosophically one-sided bid to marginalize the judicial branch. Despite the government's constant refrain that it seeks uniformity in sentencing, the government's actual policy reveals that refrain to be disingenuous. [FN 4]
[FN 4] One of the basic goals of the sentencing guidelines was to reduce sentencing disparity. However, with respect to substantial assistance departures, this goal has not been achieved. Indeed, the commentators and the U.S. Sentencing Commission itself have noted the substantial sentencing disparity among Districts in the application of Section 5K1.1. It would be naive to think that court discretion is the primary culprit driving the disparity, as the government controls the framing of Section 5K1.1 motions and often gets the departure it recommends.
March 18, 2005 at 03:01 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Judge Presnell speaks on 5K after Booker:
My husband, a white collar felon, was sentenced to 144 months and a 65M restitution while his business partner received 46 months and no restitution. This 98 month/65M discrepancy all came by the hands of the Prosecuting Attny. The disparity was vast and notably unfair. We now are in our 3rd year still awaiting the 5K1/Rule 35 for reduction. My husbands former business partner goes home this summer. OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM NEEDS AN OVERHAUL WITH THE PROSECUTING ATTNY'S AND PROBATION OFFICERS! WHAT QUACKS!!!
Posted by: Teresa Fears | Mar 18, 2005 5:58:25 PM
? if you are handed down a sentence of 48 months for conspiracy and multiple counts of trafficking does this carry a manditory jail term or is punishment based on what the juge deems appropriate.
Posted by: Andre' Crawford | Jun 16, 2005 2:30:47 PM
? if you are handed down a sentence of 48 months for conspiracy and multiple counts of trafficking does this carry a manditory jail term or is punishment based on what the judge deems appropriate.
Posted by: Andre' Crawford | Jun 16, 2005 2:31:35 PM
Posted by: | Oct 14, 2008 8:21:08 AM