« Summarizing Shepard (and seeking state insights) | Main | Helpful accounts of Shepard »

March 7, 2005

Today's other SCOTUS sentencing ruling

Because I have been focused on today's SCOTUS GVRs and the Shepard craziness, I have not yet completely taken in the Supreme Court's other notable sentencing decision today.  In Wilkinson v. Dotson, No. 03-287 (S. Ct. Mar. 7, 2005) (available here), the Court ruled 8-1 that state prisoners challenging the constitutionality of state parole procedures are not limited to pursuing relief via federal habeas, but may bring a § 1983 action for declaratory and injunctive relief.  This AP report provides a few more details.

The intricacies of these issues actually make Apprendi doctrines seem simple, and the ruling makes me wonder whether a number of state defendants might now try to challenge a range of state sentencing procedures via § 1983 actions.  Readers are highly encouraged to use the comments to detail whether they think Dotson might bring a new wave of § 1983 litigation.

UPDATE:  Mike over at Crime & Federalism has two great posts on Dotson: this one reviews the basics of the case; this one suggests, rightly I believe, that we may see a slew of § 1983 actions challenging parole procedures.

March 7, 2005 at 05:32 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d83422989153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Today's other SCOTUS sentencing ruling:

» Wilkinson v. Dotson from Crime
[Ed's note: Bumped and upated.] Unless you're concerned with prisoner's rights litigation, or you're a 1983 wonk, do not read below the fold. [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 7, 2005 7:34:26 PM

Comments

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB