August 11, 2005
The shape of the post-Booker universe
Thanks to law.com, you can access this interesting article from Texas Lawyer entitled "Survey Reveals Little Change in Sentencing Habits After Booker." The article draws on US Sentencing Commission data and interviews to spotlight "that federal trial judges across the country largely have been sentencing criminals within guideline range ... since the Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 ruling in Booker."
The article does a nice job providing context for the USSC's post-Booker sentencing data, although the national data discussed in the article comes from an older data report from last month rather than the latest, greatest USSC data released earlier this week. Interestingly, the article discusses some district-specific post-Booker data — apparently from a report that "was presented in July for a U.S. Border Conference meeting" — that I do not believe has been made generally available to the public.
August 11, 2005 at 08:27 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The shape of the post-Booker universe:
» Blog Round-up - Friday, August 12th from SCOTUSblog
Balkinization has this post up titled, "Dred Scott and Kelo." Professor Balkin argues that the closest analogy to the substantive due process argument in Dred Scott v. Sandford isn't Roe v. Wade -- its the dissenters' position in Kelo v... [Read More]
Tracked on Aug 12, 2005 10:17:27 AM
Two things come to mind. (1)It may be too soon. (2) The concept of "going rate" might apply,
namely, agreed upon punishments no matter whatthe law technically might require.
[btw the post box runs off the page making it hard to post]
Posted by: Joe | Aug 13, 2005 2:47:03 PM