« Monday around the blogosphere | Main | A judicious retort to AG Gonzales' proposed Booker fix »

September 26, 2005

A Reader's Digest version of three strikes critique

Thanks to this post at TalkLeft, I came across this interesting article attacking three-strikes laws, which appears in the October 1 issue of Reader's Digest.  The article is entitled "Petty Crime, Outrageous Punishment; Why three-strikes law doesn't work" and is authored by Carl M. Cannon.  Also interesting is this public comment page at the Reader's Digest website; most of the comments attack a perceived liberal bias in the article.

September 26, 2005 at 05:35 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d8348e4ce869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Reader's Digest version of three strikes critique:

Comments

Holy cow. If those comments are in any way indicative of what the general public thinks about sentencing issues, we are in deep trouble. Of course, if those folks got their way and we just locked everybody up forever (or execute them), at least all our post-_Booker_ worrying would be moot.

Posted by: JDB | Sep 27, 2005 8:59:17 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB