« Indiana Supreme Court gives broad interpretation to prior conviction exception | Main | A white-collar sentencing in scarlet and gray »

December 15, 2005

Two different California perspectives on reefer madness

Two cases coming from California involving sentencing for marijuana offenses caught my attention this afternoon:

  • This article reports on a state case in which a "judge chose probation over prison yesterday as the sentence for an Oceanside man convicted of growing marijuana he said was for medicinal use."  The article not only discusses controversies over California's medical marijuana laws, but also notes that this week "federal agents raided 13 medical marijuana dispensaries around the county after an investigation in which undercover agents bought marijuana without showing the paperwork required by the state law."

  • This decision today from the Ninth Circuit highlights why federal intervention can be so consequential.  In the decision, the court quickly rejected Fifth and Eighth Amendments arguments against the imposition of a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence for offenses involving 1000 or more marijuana plants.

December 15, 2005 at 01:24 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two different California perspectives on reefer madness:


Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB