« Weekend sentencing reading | Main | Controversial sentencing reforms in UK »

March 11, 2006

A high-profile case for sentencing based on acquitted conduct

As detailed in articles here and here, a "federal jury served up a mixed verdict Friday to former Atlanta Mayor Bill Campbell, convicting him on three counts of tax evasion, but acquitting him on four corruption charges."  Interestingly, this Los Angeles Times account closes by noting that "after the verdict, the prosecutors were subdued but insisted that they were not disappointed that the jury had found Campbell guilty only on the three tax counts and not the racketeering and bribery charges."

Informed followers of federal sentencing know one reason why prosecutors might not be too disappointed by the split verdict: notwithstanding the acquittals, Campbell can still be sentenced for racketeering and bribery if the sentencing judge believes he is guilty by a preponderance of evidence.  (As detailed here, the Eleventh Circuit in Duncan ruled soon after Booker that it was still permissible for judges to enhance sentences based on acquitted conduct.)

This Atlanta Journal-Constitution article previews Campbell's sentencing (which likely won't be for a few months) and rightly spots the acquitted conduct issue:

Following Friday's verdict, prosecutors said Campbell was guilty of not reporting $147,000 in income for 1997, 1998 and 1999.  Steve Sadow, one of Campbell's former attorneys, said that if that is the case, prosecutors could argue that Campbell did not pay about $40,000 in taxes.  Under federal sentencing guidelines, this amount calls for Campbell to spend between 10 months and 16 months in prison, said Sadow, who is an expert in sentencing guidelines.

The sentencing range could increase to between 21 months and 27 months in prison if [US District Judge] Story finds that $10,000 of unpaid taxes in any one year came from corrupt activities.  And even though Campbell was found not guilty of the substantive corruption counts, the acquitted conduct can still be used against him at the time of sentencing, Sadow said. "There is going to be a real fight over all of this," Sadow predicted.

Posts on acquitted conduct and related issue:

March 11, 2006 at 07:00 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d8352951ae53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A high-profile case for sentencing based on acquitted conduct:

Comments

This is a public servant who broke the law and was sentenced by 12 jurors. I think he should have been sentenced to a minimum of 5 years and maybe longer....He is a crook, the court proved it.

Posted by: David Bone | Jun 8, 2007 4:16:11 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB