« More or reforming three-strikes in California | Main | Report on IACHR hearing on mandatory minimums »

March 3, 2006

Eighth Circuit affirms Tabor

As detailed here, last year Sentencing Hall of Famer Judge Richard Kopf in US v. Tabor, No. 4:01CR3215 (D. Neb. Apr. 18, 2005), explained why he believed "that the crack Guidelines, like all other Guidelines, should be given heavy weight after Booker."  Today, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the sentence imposed in that case through US v. Tabor, No. 05-2169 (8th Cir. Mar. 3, 2006) (available here). 

In Tabor, the Eighth Circuit says relatively little about post-Booker crack sentencing, although it does stress that within-guideline sentences are presumptively reasonable and it cites various decisions upholding and enforcing sentencing within the crack guidelines.  The Eighth Circuit concludes that "Tabor has not overcome the presumption of reasonableness applicable to a Guidelines sentence."

March 3, 2006 at 03:12 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d8355e726569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eighth Circuit affirms Tabor:

Comments

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB