« The financial underbelly of local sentencing | Main | Spring break and priorities »

March 22, 2006

Eleventh Circuit affirms significant upward variance

This morning in US v. Eldick, No. 05-13006 (11th Cir. Mar. 22, 2006) (available here), the Eleventh Circuit has affirmed a 15-year sentence, the statutory maximum based on the charges of conviction, up from an applicable guideline range of roughly 7 to 9 years.  Based on the facts of the case, the Eldick court's conclusions about reasonableness seem reasonable.  However, the case provides another example, documented here and here earlier this month, of the circuit courts' tendency to find nearly all above-guidelines sentences reasonable, even though many below-guideline sentences are being reversed as unreasonable.

March 22, 2006 at 10:27 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d83528f90d53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eleventh Circuit affirms significant upward variance:

Comments

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB