March 26, 2006
Pondering the re-argument in Kansas v. Marsh
Last month in this post, I expressed surprise that the Supreme Court did not order re-argument in any of the capital cases that were first argued before Justice Alito's arrival. However, as detailed by SCOTUSblog and How Appealing, the Court on Friday did decide it needed re-argument in Kansas v. Marsh(posts here and here provide some background ). This AP story about the reargument order, as well as reactions from folks in Kansas.
Because I am not an expert on the internal deliberations of the Court, I cannot provide any educated speculation as to why the Court has only now decided it needs Justice Alito's help to resolve this case. Perhaps readers might suggest theories about what's happened in Marsh in the comments.
March 26, 2006 at 10:12 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pondering the re-argument in Kansas v. Marsh:
» Blog Round-Up - Sunday, March 26th from SCOTUSblog
Here the Volokh Conspiracy has a post on Granholm v. Heald. Here Sentencing Law & Policy ponders the re-argument in Kansas v. Marsh. Here Orin Kerr blogs about this tribute to Justice O'Connor. Here Professor Kerr blogs about Georgia v.... [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 26, 2006 6:02:10 PM