May 5, 2006
SCOTUS argument transcript for Recuenco
The last person closely watching the Supreme Court doings in the Blakely error case of Washington v. Recuenco (No. 05-83) was kind enough to let me know that the transcript from last month's oral argument is now available at this link. I fear I may not get a chance to read and comment on this transcript anytime soon, but readers are encourage to compare the actual argument transcript to my coverage in prior posts linked below:
Recent related Recuenco coverage:
- Recuenco oral argument report
- If a Blakely case is argued in the woods...
- Recuenco basics
- Why Recuenco is a big little Blakely case
- O Recuenco, Recuenco, wherefore art thou granted Recuenco?
- Recuenco post archive
May 5, 2006 at 05:46 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SCOTUS argument transcript for Recuenco:
Finally a transcript. The MSM barely covered this argument at all.
Posted by: Clarence | May 6, 2006 4:11:59 AM
Having read the argument transcript, and having re-read the parties' merits briefs, I am working on a follow up my earlier article (posted on this Blog) "Is Recuenco Sentencing Case a Big Fat Dud?" I hope to have it to Doug early in the week, and I would be flattered if he posted it here.
Posted by: Steve | May 6, 2006 12:57:45 PM