June 16, 2006
Eighth Circuit affirms yet another above-guideline sentence (and Sixth Circuit, too)
Dog bites man, again: the Eighth Circuit today affirms yet another above-guideline sentence in US v. Hacker, No. 05-2709 (8th Cir. June 16, 2006) (available here). As I recall, the Eighth Circuit has said an extraordinary justification is need for any guideline variation of 50% or more. But in Hacker, the court concludes that a sentence which amounted to a 56% increase over the maximum guidelines range was not unreasonable or an abuse of the court's discretion.
UPDATE: I now also see that the Sixth Circuit today in US v. Matheny, No. 05-6282 (6th Cir. June 16, 2006) (available here) affirmed as reasonable a sentence that was slighly above the applicable guideline range.
June 16, 2006 at 02:03 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eighth Circuit affirms yet another above-guideline sentence (and Sixth Circuit, too):
How long will the courts be silent in face of the the blatant double standard by which they affirm above-guideline sentences and reverse below-guideline sentences. This hypocritical practice demeans the federal courts and the criminal justice system; it promotes disprespect for law.
Michael R. Levine
Posted by: Michael R. Levine | Jun 16, 2006 4:15:18 PM
The short answer to your questions is: "When pigs fly." The longer answer is, "When SCOTUS cleans up its mess." But they're really the same answer.
Rule of Law? What Rule of Law? We have a Law of Rules.
Posted by: Mark | Jun 19, 2006 1:00:11 PM