July 17, 2006
Ninth Circuit stresses need for sentence explanation
On Monday in US v. Carty, No. 05-10200 (9th Cir. July 17, 2006) (available here), the Ninth Circuit reviewed its approach to reasonablenes review and reversed a within-guideline sentence because the district court failed to address the 3553(a) factors that control sentencing after Booker. Here is the Carty court's concluding paragraph:
Although several circuits have afforded a presumption of reasonableness to within-the-Guidelines sentences, [cites], we have not adopted this position. We offer no opinion whether the district court’s within-the-Guideline sentence here was, in fact, reasonable. We hold only that post-Booker, when imposing a sentence, a district court must provide on the record some articulation of its consideration of the § 3553(a) factors and explanation of the reasons underlying its sentence selection. Because the district court did not create such a record, we remand for resentencing.
July 17, 2006 at 11:29 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ninth Circuit stresses need for sentence explanation: