« Mark your SCOTUS calenders | Main | Third Circuit taking burdens en banc »

July 18, 2006

Seventh Circuit reverses within-guideline sentence, I think

Though a little opage, the Seventh Circuit's ruling in US v. Bullock, No. 05-2655 (7th Cir. July 18, 2006) (available here), seems to reverse what is arguably a within-guideline sentence (of 1200 months)! Though the facts and ruling are hardly a ringing endorsement for rigorous reasonableness review, the Seventh Circuit's reversal of the defendant's 100-year sentence for five counts of distributing heroin is still noteworthy and important.

July 18, 2006 at 11:10 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d834d6274269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Seventh Circuit reverses within-guideline sentence, I think:

Comments

But reasonableness review is not the reason for the reversal: the remand is premised on the district court's Guidelines errors regarding relevant conduct and acceptance of responsibility.

Posted by: Booker fan | Jul 19, 2006 9:59:11 AM

True: a Guidelines error creates a sentence that is per se unreasonable, and so it's hard to view the vacated sentence as "within-Guidelines"

Posted by: Steve | Jul 19, 2006 11:45:18 AM

I totally love footnote one.

Posted by: Scott | Jul 19, 2006 2:20:03 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB