« The central flaw in reasonableness review | Main | Amicus brief in Third Circuit case on burdens of proof »

August 22, 2006

Eleventh Circuit rebuffs various crack arguments

The Eleventh Circuit today in US v. Pope, No. 05-11552 (11th Cir. Aug. 22, 2006) (available here), discussed and rejects a number of constitutional challenges to a long sentence imposed in a crack case.  Though the defendant apparently did not directly attack the reasonableness of his sentence, the Pope court discusses post-Booker sentencing standards at some length.  And, to its credit, the court describes reasonableness review in decidedly non-guideline terms:

Our reasonableness review is "deferential" and focuses on whether the sentence imposed fails to achieve the purposes of sentencing as stated in ยง 3553(a). Moreover, we recognize that a range of reasonable sentences exists from which the district court may choose.

August 22, 2006 at 11:28 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d834aa6e3853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eleventh Circuit rebuffs various crack arguments:

Comments

Nobody is above the law. Although we ca often discuss it and the results that it brings.

Posted by: howard | Aug 22, 2006 3:03:06 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB