August 22, 2006
Eleventh Circuit rebuffs various crack arguments
The Eleventh Circuit today in US v. Pope, No. 05-11552 (11th Cir. Aug. 22, 2006) (available here), discussed and rejects a number of constitutional challenges to a long sentence imposed in a crack case. Though the defendant apparently did not directly attack the reasonableness of his sentence, the Pope court discusses post-Booker sentencing standards at some length. And, to its credit, the court describes reasonableness review in decidedly non-guideline terms:
Our reasonableness review is "deferential" and focuses on whether the sentence imposed fails to achieve the purposes of sentencing as stated in § 3553(a). Moreover, we recognize that a range of reasonable sentences exists from which the district court may choose.
August 22, 2006 at 11:28 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eleventh Circuit rebuffs various crack arguments:
Nobody is above the law. Although we ca often discuss it and the results that it brings.
Posted by: howard | Aug 22, 2006 3:03:06 PM