« The costly realities of the death penalty | Main | Another scholarship gap-filler from a student law journal »

September 3, 2006

The Fifth Circuit's interesting hard-to-categorize reasonableness opinion

An insightful reader noticed that, in my recent update of circuit reasonableness decisions, I did not add the Fifth Circuit's decision in US v. Tzep-Mejia (first discussed here).  I left this intriguing decision off my list primarily because Tzep-Mejia affirmed a sentence in which the district court thoughtfully refused to calculate a definitive guideline range. 

Though I am not sure how to categorize Tzep-Mejia, I am sure that the Fifth Circuit's approval of the imposition of a sentence between two possible ranges is worthy of attention.  Thus, I am happy to have this second post about Tzep-Mejia, and also pleased to see the Fifth Circuit Blog give the case an extensive review here.

September 3, 2006 at 06:51 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d8353319ed53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Fifth Circuit's interesting hard-to-categorize reasonableness opinion:

Comments

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB