« A belated Booker birthday wish | Main | A future law school exam question (or Law & Order episode) »

January 13, 2007

A hot week for DNA collection debate

As How Appealing documents here, two federal judges this past week declared unconstitutional the federal DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, which requires the US Probation Office to collect a DNA sample from any probationer, parolee, or supervised releasee "who is, or has been, convicted of a qualifying offense."  Ninth Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson, dissented from the Ninth Circuit's ruling that the law is not unconstitutional, contends that the DNA Act exceeds Congress's power under the Commerce Clause.  And, earlier this week, Massachusetts District Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts issued this remarkable decision holding that the DNA Act violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a man sentenced to probation for a theft offense.

January 13, 2007 at 08:42 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d8350cdf5669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A hot week for DNA collection debate:

Comments

To be more clear, while two of those judges said it was unconstitutional - only one counted. The other was only a dissent in an opinion.

Posted by: Deuce | Jan 13, 2007 8:54:24 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB