January 13, 2007
A hot week for DNA collection debate
As How Appealing documents here, two federal judges this past week declared unconstitutional the federal DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, which requires the US Probation Office to collect a DNA sample from any probationer, parolee, or supervised releasee "who is, or has been, convicted of a qualifying offense." Ninth Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson, dissented from the Ninth Circuit's ruling that the law is not unconstitutional, contends that the DNA Act exceeds Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. And, earlier this week, Massachusetts District Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts issued this remarkable decision holding that the DNA Act violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a man sentenced to probation for a theft offense.
January 13, 2007 at 08:42 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A hot week for DNA collection debate:
To be more clear, while two of those judges said it was unconstitutional - only one counted. The other was only a dissent in an opinion.
Posted by: Deuce | Jan 13, 2007 8:54:24 PM