« Wondering about criminal legislation that sunsets | Main | Archive of AFDA webcast »

March 30, 2007

Fifth Circuit rejects application of Crawford at capital sentencing

Thanks to How Appealing, I see that the Fifth Circuit has issued a very lengthy opinion in US v. Fields, No. 04-50393 (5th Cir. Mar. 29, 2007) (available here), addressing whether the Confrontation Clause applies at the penalty phase of a capital case.  I believe the circuit courts are split on this issue, and so was the Fifth Circuit panel in Fields: Judges Jerry Smith and Carolyn Dineen King rejected the application of Crawford at capital sentencing; Judge Fortunato P. Benavides dissented on this point.

I suspect this issue might before long capture the attention of the Supreme Court.

March 30, 2007 at 07:56 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d835278bf669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fifth Circuit rejects application of Crawford at capital sentencing:

Comments

The issue is cert-worthy. SCOTUS R. 10.

Posted by: rothmatisseko | Mar 30, 2007 3:52:39 PM

It certainly is. If every fact required to impose a particular sentence is an element, then a proceeding to find those facts before a jury is a sixth amendment trial. Why would one part of the 6th amendment apply (the jury trial right) and another not apply (the confrontation right)?

Posted by: Anon | Mar 31, 2007 4:33:43 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB