March 23, 2007
HLR case comment on crack ruling
I noted a great Harvard Law Review note on lethal injection litigation here, and now I have the opportunity to spotlight a great forthcoming HLR casenote on US v. Spears, the Eighth Circuit post-Booker crack ruling. The casenote can be downloaded below, and here is a snippet:
Recently, in United States v. Spears, the Eighth Circuit ruled that it was impermissible for a district judge to grant a reduced sentence to a crack offender based on categorical disagreement with the ratio. This decision relied on questionable conclusions about Congress’s intent regarding both the 100:1 ratio and the place of judicial policy choices in a post-Booker world, and its result cabins judges into a cramped and counterproductive role in the sentencing of crack offenders.
March 23, 2007 at 12:49 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference HLR case comment on crack ruling:
We have petitioned for cert. in Spears; I appreciate the note writer for the additional insights the note offers.
Posted by: Mark Osler | Mar 23, 2007 1:02:05 AM