« How 'bout them Buckeyes! | Main | More of the costs of a capital case »

March 23, 2007

HLR case comment on crack ruling

I noted a great Harvard Law Review note on lethal injection litigation here, and now I have the opportunity to spotlight a great forthcoming HLR casenote on US v. Spears, the Eighth Circuit post-Booker crack ruling.  The casenote can be downloaded below, and here is a snippet:

Recently, in United States v. Spears, the Eighth Circuit ruled that it was impermissible for a district judge to grant a reduced sentence to a crack offender based on categorical disagreement with the ratio. This decision relied on questionable conclusions about Congress’s intent regarding both the 100:1 ratio and the place of judicial policy choices in a post-Booker world, and its result cabins judges into a cramped and counterproductive role in the sentencing of crack offenders.

Download recent_case_united_states_v. Spears, 120 Harv. L. Rev. ___ (forthcoming May 2007).pdf

March 23, 2007 at 12:49 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200d83524e7f569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference HLR case comment on crack ruling:

Comments

We have petitioned for cert. in Spears; I appreciate the note writer for the additional insights the note offers.

Posted by: Mark Osler | Mar 23, 2007 1:02:05 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB