April 25, 2007
Notable Eighth Circuit discussion of juvenile convictions and variances
Notable circuit court reasonableness rulings I have seen today include the Third Circuit's work in US v. Batista, No. 05-2949 (3d Cir. Apr. 25, 2007) (available here), affirming a within-guideline sentence, and the Fourth Circuit's work in US v. McClung, No. 05-2949 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2007) (available here) affirming an above-guideline sentence. But the most significant of the bunch is likely the Eighth Circuit's work in US v. Feemster, No. 06-2059 (8th Cir. Apr. 25, 2007) (available here).
Feemster is another Eighth Circuit decision reversing a below-guideline sentence, though along the way the court discusses a number of interesting issues in a thoughtful manner. I found especially interesting an extended discussion of Roper and the treatment of juvenile convictions less seriously than adult convictions. Here is how that discussion concludes:
While a modest downward variance may be appropriate, because a conviction resulting from conduct while not yet eighteen is not the same as a conviction resulting from adult conduct, the extent of the variance here (eleven levels or 67%) exceeds the range of reasonable variances based on the distinction between prior convictions while a juvenile and an adult.
April 25, 2007 at 07:37 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Notable Eighth Circuit discussion of juvenile convictions and variances: