August 24, 2007
Another sentencing day in the circuits
I spent this morning enjoying a sunny, hot day on the links (though I thought about work issues a lot). But, there is no long weekend for the federal circuit courts, as evidence by two notable sentencing ruling from the Sixth Circuit that a helpful reader spotted. Here is the reader's description of the day's holdings (which can be accessed from this opinion page):
1. United States v. Kennedy: D invoked Fifth Amendment against polygraph and plethysmograph examination, on advice of counsel. When District Court overruled the objection, D appealed. District Court then revoked bond just after proof briefs were filed. D dropped appeal, but District Court used "non-cooperation" as justifying top-end sentence and lifetime supervision. A very, very conservative panel affirms.
2. United States v. Sims (Unpublished): Jury found more than 5 but less than 50 grams of crack; by proof beyond a reasonable doubt. District Court finds 500+ grams of crack for sentencing purposes by a preponderance. Sixth Circuit affirms.
August 24, 2007 at 02:29 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another sentencing day in the circuits:
You will explain what a plethysmograph is, won't you?
Posted by: S.cotus | Aug 24, 2007 3:30:07 PM
you could show some initiative and look it up online.
You're sitting in front of a keyboard, connected to the Inet and have been confronted with a word you don't know.
What to do.
What to do.
Posted by: BabbaLu | Aug 24, 2007 5:14:17 PM
My guess is that S.cotus knows what it is, but wants a detailed explanation to be in the post.
Posted by: federalist | Aug 24, 2007 5:23:33 PM
The Kennedy link is broken. Here is one that should work.
Posted by: ohwilleke | Aug 24, 2007 6:49:12 PM
Both of the machines at issue in Kennedy are junk science. Polygraphs are not admissible in evidence as a result. The other machine is described here.
Posted by: ohwilleke | Aug 24, 2007 6:54:46 PM
Also worth noting that the 6th Circuit relied primarily upon a dissenting opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court for its ruling.
Posted by: ohwilleke | Aug 24, 2007 6:59:54 PM
Of course it is junk science. But isn’t the Sixth Circuit the circuit that doesn’t follow the constitution or common sense, but rather makes decisions on the basis of personal feelings? I thought I read somewhere that they had the highest reversal rate. This is why most people agree that the Sixth Circuit should be split.
Anyway, a lot of non-scientific people like junk science, so this form of judicial activism will resonate with them.
Posted by: S.cotus | Aug 26, 2007 11:03:05 AM