October 1, 2007
Is Gall the most important SCOTUS sentencing case?
The long-standing debate over crack sentencing policy ensures that the Kimbrough case gets lots of media attention (see here and here), and national fixation with the death penalty ensures that Baze will always be an above-the-fold story (see here and here). Nevertheless, as we gear up for a major SCOTUS sentencing term, I think Gall may end up being the case and ruling with the greatest long-term significance and impact.
Whether the Supreme Court uses Gall to broaden or restrict the scope of post-Booker discretion, the decision in Gall is likely to impact greatly how all district courts sentence after Booker. The decision will also likely frame future debates over Booker as a new Attorney General (and eventually a new administration) takes stock of federal sentencing realities.
For more on the Gall case and related issues, the Des Moines Register has this helpful article and this effective editorial. The article notes that the Gall case "could affect criminal sentences in every federal courtroom in America," and the editorial calls for "Congress [to] eliminate the garden-variety drug prosecutions and return the federal courts to their original purpose of hearing major criminal cases that cut across state lines and exceed local authority and resources."
Some related SCOTUS new Term posts:
UPDATE: This CNN piece about the new SCOTUS Term is headlined "Law-and-order issues top Supreme Court docket."
October 1, 2007 at 07:55 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Gall the most important SCOTUS sentencing case?:
When can we expect an opinion in Gall and Kimbrough?
Posted by: Elson | Oct 1, 2007 10:26:59 AM
I agree. This case has very important federal sentencing implications. Hopefully, it will be an opportunity to correct the "gall" of the Eighth Circuits and other appellate courts who have been gutting Booker for two years.
Posted by: Alec | Oct 1, 2007 2:33:11 PM