December 7, 2007
Do USSC reappointments show support for new crack guidelines?
Intriguingly, this White House press release detailing some new Presidential nominations suggests that George W. Bush is happy with the recent work of the US Sentencing Commission. Specifically:
Nominations Sent to the Senate
Ricardo H. Hinojosa, of Texas, to be a Member of the United States Sentencing Commission for a term expiring October 31, 2013. (Reappointment)
Ricardo H. Hinojosa, of Texas, to be Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission. (Reappointment)
Michael E. Horowitz, of Maryland, to be a Member of the United States Sentencing Commission for a term expiring October 31, 2013. (Reappointment)
Given that the biggest actions of the USSC in recent months have been the new reduced crack guidelines and its apparent interest in allowing that amendment to be applied retroactively, I read these reappointments as an indirect blessing of the USSC's recent progressive reform efforts.
Some recent related crack sentencing posts:
- USSC analysis on potential crack amendment retroactivity impact
- A retroactive litmus test on leading Democratic candidates
- Latest FSR issue covers crack sentencing
December 7, 2007 at 11:34 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do USSC reappointments show support for new crack guidelines?:
I basically agree. It's either support or indifference, and operationally it amounts to the same thing.
Posted by: Bill Otis | Dec 7, 2007 4:04:14 PM