« New Jersey officially kills the state's death penalty | Main | Congrats to a co-author »

December 17, 2007

Interesting allocution decision from the Ninth Circuit

The Ninth Circuit today in US v. Biagon, No. 06-10479 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2007) (available here), has an interesting little opinion on allocution rights.  Here is how it begins:

In this appeal, we consider whether the district court violated the defendant’s right of allocution when it denied a motion to close the courtroom for sentencing.  We conclude that the defendant’s rights were not violated, and affirm the judgment of the district court.

Judge Kleinfeld concurs in a separate opinion to express concerns about what the majority says and ends his opinion in this way:

We ought not use this case as a vehicle to develop a new rule unnecessary to a decision that may sacrifice other important public interests to the interest in press access.

December 17, 2007 at 05:32 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e200e54fa82bc28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Interesting allocution decision from the Ninth Circuit:

Comments

typo in your post title...

Posted by: Sentencing Observer | Dec 17, 2007 6:47:40 PM

Gotta allocate the right to allocute.

Posted by: bruce | Dec 17, 2007 8:56:47 PM

fixed, thanks!

Posted by: Doug B. | Dec 18, 2007 12:58:00 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB