« More on the cool Ice grant and consecutive sentencing Blakely issue | Main | Looooong Second Circuit ruling finds below-guideline sentences unreasonable »
March 17, 2008
Perhaps federal defendants should consider taking the name "64,695 pounds of skark fins" . . .
. . . because, as detailed in a case handed down today, US v Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins, No. No. 05-56274 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2008) (available here), over 32 tons of shark fins managed to prevail with a due process claim in a civil forfeiture case in the Ninth Circuit. I wonder what David St. Hubbins might think about this ruling.
March 17, 2008 at 01:37 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/26673/27178742
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Perhaps federal defendants should consider taking the name "64,695 pounds of skark fins" . . .:
