« New ACS paper on racial disparities in the death penalty | Main | Eighth Circuit closes week with two notable sentencing opinions »

October 10, 2008

Another defendant opts for a notable shaming sanction to avoid jail time

A helpful reader pointed me to this notable local story from Wisconsin, headlined "Man Chooses To Hold 'I Was Stupid' Sign Instead of Jail Time."  Here are the details:

A judge gives a man a choice: Spend time in jail or hold a sign saying "I was stupid." Wednesday, he made that choice.  He decided he'll hold the sign.

We talked to the judge known for his strange sentences.  Judge Paul Lenz says over the years, he's handed out 20 or so similar sentences.  But, he says for the most part, the criminals pass and choose to sit out their sentences rather than face public humiliation.  They read "I was stupid," "I’m a thief," and "I stole from the families of the dead."

They're all options to reduce jail time. "It's something for them to think about," Lenz says.  "Even if they don't choose to do it, they have to think about it because they have to think about whether they'll select the option.  That means they'll think more about the consequences."

Shane McQuillan ... was found guilty of criminal damage to property after he rammed his car into the closed gate at Eau Claire's Waste Water Treatment Plant in March.  McQuillan told an officer he had been drinking and was quote "just being stupid."  Now, the 22 year old will hold a sign telling everyone "I was stupid".

The judge says he's also thinking about money when he assigns a sign. In tough budget times, he says keeping non-violent people out of jail makes sense. Then there's the humiliation. "It's a difficult thing to do if you think about it for yourself. It's basically a public acknowledgment that what you did was wrong and that's difficult for people to do," Judge Lenz says. "It's also for others who might think about doing that type of behavior to think about."

The judge says there are some guidelines to follow when it comes to a sentence.  He says it has to relate to the offense.  But, he says his sign options are voluntary and have never been appealed.

October 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e2010535792f8c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another defendant opts for a notable shaming sanction to avoid jail time:

Comments

Apologists are enamored with the breezy concept that most crime is the result of " doing something stupid".
Other than crimes of passion, most volitional criminal conduct is anything but stupid-people commit crimes because they perceive the reward greater than the risk. Few if any are apprehended for their first offense.

Any shaming signs should label a thief as such--and maybe include his prior record as well.

Posted by: mjs | Oct 10, 2008 12:33:01 PM

Because that'll stop 'em! Will the willful ignorance ever end?

Posted by: DK | Oct 11, 2008 1:39:51 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB