« More on Justice Alito's climb out of the cert. pool | Main | Lots of crime, but little punishment, in new SCOTUS grants »

October 1, 2008

SCOTUS plays foot(note)sie as it denies rehearing in Kennedy

As I had expected (and had predicted here and elsewhere), the Supreme Court denied Louisiana petition for rehearing in the Kennedy child rape case.  Over at Sex Crimes, Corey has this effective post covering this ruling and the footnotes added to the main opinion and the dissent to address the previously overlooked military law that prompted the rehearing petition.  In addition, Justices Kennedy and Scalia wrote short opinions about the rehearing decision.

I may comment more on this decision after I get a chance to consume the specifics and do some posting on the other action from the SCOTUS order list today.  Tony Mauro has this report on the ruling at The BLT, and SCOTUSblog more on all the action from One First Street today.

October 1, 2008 at 11:18 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e20105351a1636970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SCOTUS plays foot(note)sie as it denies rehearing in Kennedy:

» Xanax overdose. from Xanax.
Buy xanax. Pictures of xanax. Online xanax. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 14, 2009 1:16:04 PM

» Adipex p. from Adipex 37.5 fedex overnight.
Adipex hurt me. Phentermine adipex. Adipex phentermine cash on delivery phentermine mg. No prescription adipex. Adipex. Adipex p. Adipex 37.5. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 22, 2009 5:08:32 AM

Comments

A couple more potshots at the majority by Scalia in what is essentially a concurring opinion in the denial of rehearing...good for a laugh if nothing else.

Posted by: NewFedClerk | Oct 1, 2008 11:37:27 AM

This decision was fundamentally illegitimate.

Posted by: federalist | Oct 1, 2008 12:30:46 PM

So much for the claim that the 8th amendment is not a ratchet.

Posted by: Soronel Haetir | Oct 1, 2008 12:49:30 PM

“This decision was fundamentally illegitimate.”

It is too bad that you were not able to convince the Supreme Court of your point. Maybe if you were a better writer the substantive law would have gone your way.

Posted by: S.cotus | Oct 1, 2008 1:44:33 PM

He's got proof by assertion; what more does he need?

Posted by: B. Robinson | Oct 1, 2008 6:13:02 PM

I really like this blog, you are very good making them. I say that the issue discussed in this blog is quite interesting and of high quality.

Posted by: soft cialis | Nov 17, 2009 3:28:05 PM

hello friend excellent post about SCOTUS plays foot(note)sie as it denies rehearing in Kennedy I really enjoyed reading this information

Posted by: buy viagra | Jan 19, 2010 10:50:29 AM

The concept of “online pharmacy no prescription” is designed for the purpose of providing medication over the internet (online) for all those people all over the world who are in dire need of suitable medication at reasonable prices, which is exactly the reason behind generic meds.

Posted by: phentermine 37.5 without prescription | Mar 17, 2010 1:31:18 PM

try to find some info?> what branch in the military like navy ma, airforce sf, or army mp actully make arrest or can make arrest? aand who actully does more type of law enforcment?

Posted by: breast engorgement | Mar 24, 2010 4:39:21 PM

It's horrible. I hope justice will reach those who are guilty.

Posted by: Buy Viagra | Apr 22, 2010 4:28:17 AM

I’m glad to see this post.

Thanks! Great Blog! Very useful information!

Thanks again guys!

Posted by: חלקי חילוף לרכב בתל אביב | Jan 3, 2011 8:25:02 AM

So educational things are provided the following, I really happy to look at this post, I was think of about it and you supplied me the correct info I really bookmark that, for further reading, Thus thanks for sharing the data.

Posted by: pandora | Jan 27, 2011 8:39:11 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB