« Conrad Black appeals to Justice Stevens for bail pending SCOTUS ruling | Main | Efforts in Connecticut to convince Governor Rell to sign death penalty repeal bill »

May 29, 2009

A few ruminations about judging without empathy (and sentencing by computers)

TennisWhile some SCOTUS nominee "empathy" discussion has been silly, the basic debate over the role of empathy in judging has a number of interesting facets.  The folks at The Volokh Conspiracy, for example, have been talking through the issue in interesting ways in these recent posts:

Though I do not want to jump too deeply into the whole "empathy" debate, I cannot help but ruminate a bit on whether we would find it appealing to have judges without any empathy.  Specifically, I am wondering if most folks would be comfortable and content being judged in various settings by a sophisticated computer rather than by a human being.  Candidly, I do not have a certain answer or strong instinct about whether I would generally prefer being judged by sophisticated computers rather than by smart humans.  Like all good questions, my answer to this query might just be "It depends."

Usefully, sports provide an interesting example of one setting in which judging by computers seems preferable to judging by humans.  As tennis fans know, disputed line calls in high-profile events are now judged by Hawk-Eye, a sophisticated ball-tracking system that reports whether a shot was in or out.  My sense is that, because the criteria are objective and simple, having judging done by sophisticated computers is an improvement over judging done by humans in tennis line-calls.

But, of course, most legal decisions are not as simple as the in/out call in tennis.  To continue the sports metaphor, we might say legal decisions are more like pass interference calls in football, with multiple dynamic (and subjective?) factors often in play (e.g., who initiated contact, was the contact excessive, was the ball catchable).  In addition to being unsure if NFL officials should have empathy for certain players or teams — the Detroit Lions could sure use help —  I am also unsure if I would want a computer making pass interference calls from a skybox rather than the human ref on the field.

To give this all a sentencing spin, recall some interesting comments by Judge Marvin Frankel nearly 40 years ago when he was complaining about judicial sentencing disparity.  In Criminal Sentences: Law without Order (1972), Judge Frankel called for the creation of a "code of penal law" to "prescribe guidelines for the application and assessment" of the "numerous factors affecting the lengthy or severity of sentences." (p. 113.)  In so doing, he raised the specter of sentencing by computers in this nuanced way (at pp. 114-115):

It is not necessary, or desirable, to imagine that sentencing can be completely computerized.  At the same time, the possibility of using computers as an aid toward orderly thought in sentencing need not be discounted in advance....  [T]his does not envisage the displacement of people by machines.  The need for delicate and difficult judgments will remain for as long as a future as is now imaginable.  What will change, we might hope, is the uncharted expanse in which such judgments are now undertaken.

In light of the empathy debate, I find its still timely to wonder if we would want any arena of judging under the law to become "completely computerized."  And, in light of decades of state and federal experiences with guidelines designed to influence "delicate and difficult" sentencing judgments, it is also timely to wonder more energy might now be put toward Judge Frankel's suggested "possibility of using computers as an aid toward orderly thought in sentencing."

May 29, 2009 at 02:56 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201156fbaf4e9970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A few ruminations about judging without empathy (and sentencing by computers):

Comments

Doug, why do you link to that awful blog, and why oh why do I click on the link when I know better. Volokh and Co are unmitigated idiots. Period.

Here we go again with lawyers spouting off on psychology when it is a topic on which they were never trained and know absolutely nothing about. When I first heard the term empathy re SCOTUS my mind simply tuned it out. My assumption was simply that like so many things it was a code word for something else and that no one in their right mind would think that empathy was a criteria pro or con for a SCOTUS nominee. I should have known better. Were dealing with lawyers here, after all.

But alas, I know the drill. Lawyers will take empathy and mean whatever the hell they want to mean by that term and everyone else should just butt out.

Posted by: Daniel | May 29, 2009 6:20:21 PM

Daniel: Empathy is lawyer code for the transfer of assets from productive people, mostly to lawyers, with the low life lawyer client as an excuse. This is at the point of a gun. The lawyer has zero empathy for the non-client, the civil defendant (the lawyer cries buckets for the criminal defendant), the public, especially, the tiny fraction of the public that pays taxes. It is a synonym for lawyer blood sucking.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 29, 2009 10:20:29 PM

Empathy violates the Equal Protection rights of less attractive defendants. General ugliness has yet to become a lawyer privileged pretext to plunder employers, but it soon will be. Empathy also brings the common law into the criminal law, a violation of legality (Hudson, 1812). The cases ending sentencing guidelines do as well.

The criminal lover lawyer is absolutely heartless when it comes to past and future crime victims. He boohoos only for the vicious predator that provides the lawyer with a job.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 30, 2009 5:33:31 AM

Doug, There is a cert petition pending in SCOTUS with a bit of a connection to the "empathy" discussion, Narron v North Carolina, filed May 5. Last Thursday the Court directed the Attorney General to respond.

The issue is whether a result on a machine, the Intoxilyzer used in driving while impaired cases, creates an irrebutable presumption of guilt. I've been working with the attorney representing the petitioner, Matt Davenport, and the pitch is that there is still a place for juries to decide disputed facts in this technological era of computers and machines.

bruce cunningham

Posted by: bruce cunningham | May 30, 2009 8:32:29 AM

Bruce: For $10,000, any half competent lawyer, taking 10 minutes on the internet, will beat any machine test in court. The list of variables, and the technical aspects that can result in a false reading is nearly infinite. Any lawyer can trip up the police on the stand. And if that fails, how about the Binaca Blast defense? If that fails, demand the code in the machine. It will be refused. Then demand a mistrial.

See these guys. They found 19,000 errors in the code.

http://www.dwi.com/new-jersey/state-v-chun

Why is empathy necessary?

Any result on a machine should create an irrebutable presumption of malfunction. Empathy is lawyer code for lawyer blood sucking. Why do we have to bring it in if technology is involved?

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 30, 2009 10:15:20 AM

S C and Bruce, I agree, but I wish to point out, you have to have $10,000. Or more, for any good defense. So, where is justice? Why are we even discussing anything, when money buys freedom in America, and poor people do not actually have a defense without vast amounts of money?

Posted by: DL | May 30, 2009 10:39:49 AM

DL: The lawyer should be paid for his skill and time, when providing value, not rent. Your point is correct, there is unfairness. I do not have a good solution for disparity of outcome by income.

It is worse than that, even for the wealthy. A guilty verdict may save the life of the defendant, if the judge orders him into treatment and off the road. I would be curious about the follow up of the defendants of these slick DUI specialists. How many were hurt because their lawyers were so aggressive? If I were a lawyer, and my client shows up drunk to a preparation session, I would advise a plea deal, rather than total victory. Because one can does not mean one should.

My interest is upstream. All law is unauthorized human experimentation. If you set a blood alcohol level by statute, it should have been proven safe and effective in testing in small jurisdictions. Scientific validity is embedded in the Equal Protection Clause, since part of validity is repeatability, a synonym for equal treatment. Show a blood alcohol level rule reduces harm in a small jurisdiction, then pass it in the larger one. Prove the reduction in injury came from the rule, and not from advances in trauma care.

An Amendment should be enacted to have a science review board, as a fourth co-equal branch overturn law, regulation, and court decision if it violates basic science tenets. It should be apolitical. Any member furthering a political agenda should be charged with a crime. That branch of non-lawyers would provide cover for the lawyer.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 30, 2009 11:04:30 AM

An e-judging system's big advantage could well derive from the fresh start it would entail.

Especially if the humans who'd program it were immersed in empathy training before starting their task.

The training should expose them to mock, but true-to-life, interrogation and plea-bargaining sessions. It should include spending at least seven days incognito in a federal pen.

My bet is the subsequent computer-dispensed punishments would come much closer to fitting the crimes than the seemingly arbitrary, stunningly harsh sentences that emerged from the last attempt at a mechanistic, if not computerized, system.

If the sentencing guidelines had been concocted to produce justice outcomes, that kind of empathy training could have helped a lot.

But of course the guidelines were designed instead to cut judges out of the loop and empower prosecutors to efficiently leverage plea agreements. So unless that goal changes, why bother with computers?

Posted by: John K | May 30, 2009 11:53:34 AM

Claus,

Your every post drips with empathy for crime victims and non-lawyers. Someone with a more scientific mind would view our legal and penal systems with dispassion, but not you: it is obvious that every fiber of your being contains limitless empathy for those unfortunate souls forced to share the world with criminals and rent-seeking lawyers.

I would not dare to criticize such bottomless compassion, but tell me: how can we trust the words of someone whose judgment is so clouded by empathy?

Posted by: CN | May 30, 2009 3:28:09 PM

I love the lawyer. There is no greater love than a love great enough to correct.

It is the lawyer I love. The utter failure of every goal of every law subject is deeply moving to me. I want to help.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 30, 2009 6:22:10 PM

CN: Also, Prof. B has yet to try this advocacy trick. I have yet to try it on him.

"Switch sides."

I can do this and be just as fresh. I bet he cannot, being a cult indoctrination victim. It is not in there for him. For example, he has yet to respond to the idiotically easy request, say the V word. He can't. We would need an ambulance standing by if decided to try it. I think a $million retainer could not make him say that word, in the criminal law. In a tort tribunal? He would be repeatedly shouting it, and crying buckets of tears in front of the world's press.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | May 30, 2009 6:28:53 PM

Probably the first computerized sentencing factor will be actuarial risk prediction.

Static Cling?: Seventh Circuit Doubts Reliability of STATIC-99 Results In Recent Opinion (from EvidenceProf Blog).

Posted by: anon | May 31, 2009 11:21:29 AM

IS THIS REPORTED GAY SANTA MONICA COMMISSIONER JUST ONE BAD EXAMPLE OF A NEW POLICY IN AMERICAN FAMILY COURTS ALL ACROSS AMERICA OF DON'T ASK AND WE WON'T TELL ???


LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE VERY REAL POSSIBILITY THAT COMMISSIONER DAVID J. COWAN OF SANTA MONICA CA COURT HOUSE IS A CLOSET GAY MAN OR FOR THAT MATTER ~ OPEN GAY MAN, THAT HAS SOMEHOW BEEN GIVEN COURT CASES INVOLVING FAMILY CHILD CUSTODY ISSUES AND IS THE NEWEST FACE OF WHAT IS TO COME IN AMERICAN FAMILY COURTS ACROSS AMERICA ?????????????????

MR.DAMON DUVAL AND HIS TWO WONDERFUL CHILDREN (MAYA & JAZZ ) HAVE ALL NOW BEEN KEPT APART FROM ENJOYING EACH OTHERS COMPANY BY COMMISSIONER DAVID J. COWAN SINCE DECENBER 4 2008. FOR SOME VERY UNCLEAR REASONING THIS APPARENT GAY NAPOLEON COMMISSIONER APPEARS TO BE MORE INTERESTED IN MR.DUVALS MENTAL HEALTH STATUS THEN THE LIVE IN BOYFRIEND OF HIS EX WIFE OF THE LAST 2 YRS., WHO HAS BEEN REPORTED TO THE EL SEGUNDO POLICE DEPARTMENT AS HAVING TOUCHED MR. DUVALS LITTLE 3 YR OLD MAYA ON HER PRIVATE PARTS ??

THIS SANTA MONICA COURT COMMISSIONER APPOINTED CHILDREN'S COUNCIL AT MR. DUVALS REQUEST (LAWYER AMY NEIMAN OF SANTA MONICA CA) WHO HAS BEEN MORE INTERESTED IN ACTING AS A MENTAL HEALTH EXPERT( WITHOUT THE QUALIFIED DEGREES ) AND MISLEADING THIS CHILD CUSTODY MATTER INTO GAY NEVER NEVER LAND WITH THIS SANTA MONICA COMMISSIONER FOLLOWING HER FEMALE INTUITION & ADVICE CONCERNING THE MENTAL HELATH STATUS OF MR. DUVAL!

FOR SOMEONE WITHOUT MENAL HEALTH DEGREES TO QUESTION THE PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT OF THE MENTAL HEALTH EXPERT WHO HAS ALWAYS STATED CLEARLY TO THE COURT THAT MR. DUVAL IS OF SOUND MIND AND WOULD TESTIFY IN PERSON TO THE COURT CONCERNING THIS FACT, IS ALMOST ANOTHER FUTURE LEGAL CASE FOR LA COUNTY WAITING TO HAPPEN ?

**WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THE LA COUNTY COURT SYSTEM TO OPEN A INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO THE SERIOUS COMPLICATIONS THAT ENCOMPASS THIS POSSIBLE CHILD PEDOPHILE CUSTODY CASE AND HOPE THAT ALL CURRENT COURT APPOINTED LAWYERS WORKING FOR LA COUNTY LIKE AMY NEIMAN ARE ADVISED TO HELP PREVENT CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS RATHER THEN CREATING ONE IN THE FUTURE !


LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS WILL CONTINUE WRITING ABOUT THIS SPECIFIC LEGAL CASE ON THE WWW UNTIL A PROPER OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION OF THESE PEDOPHILE CHARGES HAS BEEN PROPERLY ANSWERED !!!

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS HAS A VERY DIFFICULT TIME WITH ANY RESULTS THAT COME FROM THE EL SEGUNDO POLICE CONCERNING THIS INVESTIGATION DUE TO THE CLOSE RELATIONSHIP OF MR. DUVALS FORMER WIFES CURRENT DIVORCE ATTORNEY (MR.ROY KIGHT )HAVING HAD HIS LAW OFFICE SITUATED IN EL SEGUNDO FOR THE LAST 20 YRS.+ , AND HAVING GOOD FRIENDS IN EL SEGUNDO TO DO HIM CERTAIN FAVORS WHEN NEEDED !!!

~ A SIX MONTH RESTRAINING ORDER THAT BEGAN THIS CHILD CUSTODY SEPERATION OF MR. DUVAL AND HIS CHILDREN WAS BASED ON A EL SEGUNDO REPORT THAT MR. DUVAL SAYS WAS CLEARLY FABRICATED ABOUT HIM TO MAKE HIM LOOK BAD TO THIS PRESIDING JUDGE ~

*** ISN'T IT A LITTLE ODD THAT THIS EL SEGUNDO LAWYER MR.ROY KIGHT WAS ABLE TO PREDICT 22 MONTHS AHEAD OF TIME BY TELLING MR. DUVAL OUTSIDE A SANTA MONICA COURT~ ROOM THAT HE WAS "GOING TO TAKE AWAY ALL HIS CHILD VISITATION AWAY BETWEEN HIM AND HIS CHILDREN AND THAT THIS IS A POKER GAME FELLA AND ARE YOU READY TO PLAY " ***

NO MR. DEVALS MENTAL HEALTH IS NOT THE ISSUE IN THIS LEGAL CASE, THE REAL ISSUE HERE IS DID THIS DIVORCE LAWYER ROY KIGHT SET MR. DUVAL UP WITH GAINING FALSE TESTIMONY IN EL SEGUNDO CA AND INFLUENCE THE EL SEGUNDO PEDOPHILE INVESTIGATION OF HIS 3YR, OLD DAUGHTER ???


ATTORNEY ROY KIGHT IS ON THE RECORD AS HAVING PREVIOUSLY THREATENED MR. DUVAL OUTSIDE THE SANTA MONICA COURT ROOM AND WE FEEL MIGHT ALSO BE SO CAUGHT UP IN THIS CUSTODY BATTLE AND THAT HE MIGHT HAVE HAD WAY TOO MUCH INFLUENCE AND INTEREST WITH THE PEDOPHILE INVESTIGATION THAT NEVER TOOK PLACE ????????????????

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IF LAWYER ROY KIGHT WOULD ADMIT UNDER OATH (AND SUPPLY INVESTIGATORS HIS PHONE RECORDS) AS TO NOT EVER ATTEMPTING TO INFLUENCE THE FORMER (NOW RETIRED EL SEGUNDO POLICE DETECTIVE MULRONEY CONCERNING THIS PEDOPHILE CRIMINAL LEGAL CASE ???????????????????????????

WE ENCOURAGE EVERYONE INTERESTED IN PREVENTING FAMILY COURT GAY COMMISSIONERS AND JUDGES ACROSS AMERICA FROM CONTINUING TO ALLOW THEIR COURT APPOINTED LAWYERS LIKE (AMY NEIMAN OF SANTA MONICA) TO MISLEAD JUDGES AROUND THE COUNTRY LIKE WHAT HAPPENED IN MR. DUVALS CHILD CUSTODY CASE IN SANTA MONICA CA,TO CALL THEIR GOVERNMENT LEADERS WHO THEY FEEL MIGHT BE ABLE TO HELP MAKE THE NEEDED CHANGES IN THIS LEGAL PROCESS FROM SEPERATING AND DESTROYING OTHER FAMILIES IN OTHER CITIES AND TOWNS ACROSS OUR COUNTRY !!!


***PLEASE ENTER THESE TITLES LISTED BELOW INTO ANY WWW SEARCH ENGINE TO SEE THE FIRST OF MANY WRITTEN ARTICLES CONCERNING MR. DUVAL AND HIS TWO CHILDREN. THE PICTURE OF THIS CARING AND LOVING FATHER WITH HIS TWO BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN IS SPECIAL AND SAYS IT ALL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


1) SANTA MONICA SCANDAL CREATED BY THE U.S. CONGRESS ~
2) PRESIDENT OBAMA YOU TUBES 4 U.S KIDS !!!
3) AMERICAN DIVORCE COURTS NEED A GIDEON FROM U.S.SUPREME COURT !!!


LAINDYMEDIA.ORG HAD THIS VERY SPECIAL PICTURE FEATURED WITH THE ARTICLES ! WE ALSO ENCOURAGE ANYONE INTERESTED TO ALSO WATCH THE VIDEOS MR. DEVAL HAS OF HIM SPENDING YEARS OF TIME BEING TOGETHER WITH HIS KIDS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (beach,hikes in Santa Monica Mountains,riding scooters in parks,etc on ~
BIGDADDYMAYAANDJAZZ.COM OR AT THE END OF PREVIOUS ARTICLES UNDER VIDEOS .....


LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS A WWW LOBBY GROUP MADE UP OF VOLUNTEERS WHO CONTINUE TO LOBBY AROUND THE WORLD ON THE WWW FOR MIDDLE CLASS AND WORKING POOR AMERICANS TO ALL BE AFFORDED PROPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION BY OUR U.S. CONGRESS IN CIVIL, CRIMINAL AND FAMILY COURTS OF LAW NATIONWIDE.

JUST ENTER LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS OR OUR PHONE NUMBER INTO ANY WWW SEARCH ENGINE TO READ PREVIOUS ARTICLES FROM AROUND THE WORLD !
lawyersforpooramericans@yahoo.com (424-247-2013)

WE ALSO WANT TO GIVE YOU ANOTHER SMALL SAMPLE OF OTHER WRITTEN ARTICLES THAT LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS HAS PUBLISHED ON THE WWW.

1) TROY DAVIS,PLEASE REMEMBER THAT AMERICA IS NOT THE OLD SOUTH ~ AFRICA !!!

2) MANNY GONZALES THE KID THAT EVERYONE FORGOT IN THE CA PRISON SYSTEM !

3) REV RICK WARREN, THESE REALLY ARE CRIMES AGAINST HUMNITY ISSUES !!

4) ARE THEY KINGS OF SLAVES OR THE U.S. CONGRESS ??

5) PRINCE CHARLES, PLEASE REMEMBER THAT IRAN GAVE U.S. JOURNALIST ROXANA A FAIR TRIAL !!!

6) INTERNATIONAL PROTEST WITH GOOGLE NEWS STORY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT TO SAVE 2 AMERICANS !!!

7) DOES OPRAH CONDONE THIS INJUSTICE ???

8) INNOCENT AMERICANS ARE DENIED HC RIGHTS WITH THEIR FEDERAL APPEALS !!

9) U.S. JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS IN NEED OF BILLIONS IN BAILOUT FROM IVORY TOWER U.S. CONGRESS !

10) WHEN THE INNOCENT ARE ABANDONED BY THE GUILTY !!

11) PRESIDENT OBAMA DID NOT CREATE THIS MESS, BUT LETS ALL SAY A PRAYER FOR HIS SUCCESS !!!

12) ACTOR CHRIS NOTH AND MARK BURK SLANDERED BY MODEL BEVERLY JOHNSON !!

13) POORER AMERICAN S NEEDS WORLDS COURT HELP !

14) WILL THE ROYAL FAMILY NOW HELP PRESIDENT OBAMA FREE THEM ?

15) U.S.CONGRESS DECADES OF NEGLECT & ABUSE OF POORER AMERICANS ~ A SAD AND TRAGIC REALITY !!!

16) AND GEORGIA WANTS TO EXECUTE TROY DAVIS ???

17) IS NELSON MANDELA NEEDED IN AMERICA TO CORRECT THIS INJUSTICE ???

18) THIS SUPREME COURT KNEW REAL JUSTICE ?

19) 100,000 INNOCENT U.S. PRISON INMATES HAVE BEEN WRITTEN OFF BY OUR GOVERNMENT !!!

20) WORLD COURT FINDS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY IN USA !!!

21) WHY DO POORER AMERICANS NEED GOD TO LOBBY OUR U.S. CONGRESS SENATOR OBAMA ???

22) WHERE ARE AMERICAS RELIGIOUS LEADERS WHEN IT BECOMES THIS EASY TO EXECUTE EVEN INNOCENT AMERICANS ???

23) MIDDLE CLASS AND WORKING POOR AMERICANS HAVE BEEN PORTRAYED BY RICH AMERICA !!!

24) AMERICAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM NEEDS C*H*A*N*G*E...

25) WILL THE POPE NOW SPEAK OUT ABOUT THESE AMERICAN INJUSTICES ???

26) WHEN GODS FACE BECAME VERY RED !!!

27) ARE AMERICAS RELIGIOUS LEADERS BEING SILENCED ?

28) IS THE U.S.GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ??

29) THANK GOD PRESIDENT OBAMA RESPECTS OUR POORER AMERICANS !!!

30) U.S.CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS HAD TO BEG U.$ CONGRE$$ ...

31) GOD AND PRESIDENT OBAMA ARE WALKING HAND IN HAND ON THIS ONE !!!

By LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS
lawyersforpooramericans@yahoo.com 424-247-2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DouglasField


THIS SANTA MONICA COMMISSIONER DOES NOT BELONG IN FAMILY COURT ANYWHERE IN AMERICA !!!

ALL OUR READERS ARE ENTITLED TO KNOW THAT MR. DUVAL HAS BEEN PICKETING IN FRONT OF THE SANTA MONICA COURTHOUSE NOW FOR 21 WEEKS MONDAY - FRIDAY FROM 9AM TO CLOSING AT 4:30 PM !

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS IN TOTAL DISBELIEF THAT COMMISSIONER DAVID COWAN WOULD EVER THINK THAT HE IS EVEN CAPABLE SOMEHOW OF EVER BEING A FAMILY COURT JUDGE IN THE FUTURE IN SANTA MONICA WITH THIS BIASED JUDICIAL MENTALITY TOWARDS STRAIGHT MEN WITH THEIR CHILDREN !

IT IS OBVIOUS TO ANY HONEST PERSON VIEWING THIS LEAGL HORROR STORY THAT COMMISSIONER COWAN HAS DONE EVERYTHING IN HIS POWER TO DESTROY THE LOVING RELATIONSHIP MR. DUVAL HAS HAD WITH HIS TWO CHILDREN AND I WOULD DARE SAY THAT THIS COMMISSIONER COWAN WOULD BE WELCOME TO SIT IN ANY COURTHOUSE IN FAMILY COURT WITH MEAN SPIRITED CALLOUS DECISIONS AS THESE PORTRAYED IN THE DUVAL LEGAL CASE !!!!

**LAST MONDAY THIS SO CALLED GAY COMMISSIONER, AGAIN CONTINUED HIS CALLOUS DECISION MAKING IN THE DUVAL LEGAL CASE BY TURNING DOWN MR. DUVALS (AND ANY LOVING FATHERS NORMAL REQUEST) TO BE WITH HIS KIDS ON FATHERS DAY !

MR. DUVAL IS SUPPOSE TO ONLY GET 10 MINUTE PHONE CALLS EVERY NIGHT WITH HIS TWO KIDS (IF THE EX WIFE DECIDES TO EVEN PICK UP THE PHONE ?)

COMMISSIONER COWAN HAS ISOLATED TWO BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN FROM A LOVING FATHER WHO HAS SPENT YEARS HAVING FUN AT THE BEACH,HIKING IN THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS, RIDING SCOOTERS ALL OVER VENICE BEACH ETC...WITH HIS KIDS ???

*** PLEASE VISIT MR. DUVALS WEB SITE
BIGDADDYJAZZANDMAYA.COM TO SEE THE VIDEOS OF DAMON DUVAL WITH HIS KIDS AT THE LOCAL POOL, IN THE SCHOOLS ON SPECIAL EVENTS ..ETC

MR. DUVAL HAS SPENT YEARS ENJOYING AND LOVING HIS TWO CHILDREN TO HAVE THIS ONE MAN CONTINUE IN HIS VICIOUS ATTEMPTS TO DESTROY THE LOVING BOND HE HAS HAD WITH BOTH CHILDREN.

LAWYERS FOR POOR AMRICANS HAS INFORMED MR. DUVAL THAT WE WILL CONTINUE TO FIGHT FOR HIS GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO CONTINUE BEING THE LOVING FATHER TO BOTH LITTLE MAYA AND JAZZ !!!

SANTA MONICA COURT HOUSE HAS NOW BECOME A FUTURE BATTLE~ GROUND LOCATION FOR STRAIGHT FAMILIES IN AMERICA TO DEMAND TO HAVE THEIR COMMISSIONERS AND JUDGES NOT BE CLOSET GAYS OR OPEN GAYS DECIDING CHILD CUSTODY MATTERS !!!

THANK YOU COMMISSIONER COWAN FOR DEMONSTARTING TO STRAIGHT AMERICA THAT BIASED GAY MEN LIKE YOURSELF DO NOT RESPECT TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES AND SHOULD NEVER EVER BE IN FAMILY COURT OR EVER GIVEN CHILD CUSTODY LEGAL CASES !!!

Posted by: LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS | Jun 11, 2009 1:24:52 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB