May 6, 2009
Procedural reasonableness reversal leads to big substantive sentence reduction
Thanks to a reader, I noticed a local article updating the interesting sentencing story of US v. Maynor. As detailed in this February post, the Fourth Circuit (in an unpublished opinion!) found an above-guideline sentence given to a former local sheriff to be procedurally unreasonable. This local article now provides, in the words of Paul Harvey, the rest of the story:
Former Robeson County Sheriff Glenn Maynor’s federal prison sentence was cut to two years on Tuesday, according a newspaper report. The Robesonianreported Tuesday evening that Maynor’s six-year sentence was dropped to 24 months....
In February, the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that Glenn Maynor’s six-year sentence was too harsh in light of sentencing guidelines and the facts that the judge cited in issuing the sentence. The recommended range was 18 to 24 months....
Maynor was the highest-ranking lawman swept up in Operation Tarnished Badge, a six-year probe into corruption in the Robeson County Sheriff’s Office. Twenty-three people, mostly deputies, pleaded guilty to crimes that included kidnapping, money laundering, racketeering, theft of federal money and satellite piracy. Their sentences ranged from a few months to 34 years in prison.
Maynor pleaded guilty to lying to a grand jury and to allowing deputies to get paid for working at his home and at his election campaign’s golf tournament. He was sheriff from 1994 to 2004.
May 6, 2009 at 06:03 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Procedural reasonableness reversal leads to big substantive sentence reduction: