July 13, 2009
"The Unexceptionalism of Evolving Standards"
The title of this post is the title of this new article from Professor Corinna Lain. It looks like an interesting and important and timely piece with the SCOTUS confirmation hearing now on-going and the big SCOTUS juve LWOP cases on the horizon. Here is the abstract:
Conventional wisdom is that outside the Eighth Amendment context, the Supreme Court does not engage in the sort of explicitly majoritarian state nose-counting for which the 'evolving standards of decency' doctrine is famous. Yet this impression is simply inaccurate. Across a stunning variety of civil liberties contexts, the Court routinely, and explicitly, bases constitutional protection on whether a majority of states agree with it. This Article examines the Supreme Court’s reliance on the majority position of the states to identify constitutional norms, then turns to the qualifications, explanations, and implications of state polling as a larger doctrinal phenomenon. While the past few years have seen an explosion of constitutional law scholarship demonstrating the Supreme Court’s majoritarian tendencies, the most powerful evidence of the Court’s inherently majoritarian nature has been right under our noses all along: its widespread use of explicitly majoritarian doctrine.
July 13, 2009 at 05:51 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "The Unexceptionalism of Evolving Standards":
Lawyers give all state legislators $1000's a year, for "access." So the count of states with a policy position is a Trojan Horse for lawyer rent seeking.
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Jul 13, 2009 11:15:38 PM