September 29, 2009
Important new NACDL report critical of modern drug court movementAs detailed in this news release, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers has today released an important new report on drug courts. The title of the press release. "Drug Courts Endanger Rights, Block Access To Needed Treatment for Drug Users: Defense Lawyers Call for Major Overhaul," highlights that the NACDL is not in favor of extant drug court models. Here is the start of the press release, which provides a partial summary of the report:
Drug courts – first created 20 years ago as an emergency response to an epidemic of drug-related criminal cases that clogged courts and prisons – have in many places become an obstacle to making cost-efficient drug abuse therapy available to addicts and reducing criminal case loads, the nation’s largest association of criminal defense attorneys said today.
In too many places, access to treatment comes at the cost of a guilty plea for low-level drug offenses while hard cases are denied and offenders wind up in jail at great expense to taxpayers, a report by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers found. The report flowed out of a two-year task force study of problem-solving courts.
Well-intended prosecutors and judges, generally with little input from the defense bar, often limit entry to treatment to offenders most likely to solve their own problems while insisting that “harder cases” go to jail, at considerable taxpayer expense, the study found. Minorities, immigrants and those with few financial resources are often under-represented in drug court programs.
The full report, which is titled "“America’s Problem-Solving Courts: The Criminal Costs of Treatment and the Case for Reform,” is available at this link. This report strikes me as quite an important development in the drug court movement, and thus it is today's must-read for any and everyone who has tended to view drug courts and other problem-solving courts as a positive development and part of a healthy evolution away from unduly punitive tough-on-crime approaches.
This report also seems especially timely in light of President Obama's and Attorney General Holder's apparent affinity for drug courts (as noted in prior posts here and here and here). Indeed, as evidence by many links below, there have been very few loud voices speaking up against modern drug courts until this new report by NACDL.
Some related posts about drug court programs and research:
- New report on drug courts from The Sentencing Project
- NJ commission endorsing expanding drug courts
- A religious pitch for drug courts
September 29, 2009 at 10:33 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Important new NACDL report critical of modern drug court movement:
» Blog Scan from Crime and Consequences Blog
Justice Kennedy at the Ninth Circuit is the subject of this post by Orin Kerr at VC: "I understand that Justice Kennedy was the final speaker on a panel about the procedure for issuing Ninth Circuit opinions. The first speaker... [Read More]
Tracked on Sep 29, 2009 6:35:57 PM
Posted by: Steve Erickson | Sep 30, 2009 1:38:17 PM