November 24, 2009
Seeking help working though the Second Amendment amicus briefs filed in McDonald
As SCOTUSblog notes here, many amici briefs in support of applying the Second Amendment to state and local laws were filed yesterday in the McDonald case, and many of these amici filings are linked at via this Chicago Gun Case webpage (and many are also being noted and discussed at The Volokh Conspiracy). Including the merits briefs, I now count 34 briefs filed in the McDonald case.
Especially because I consider Second Amendment incorporation pretty much a fait accompli (as explained here), I am checking out these McDonald briefs mostly to see what they might be saying for the really hard Second Amendment questions on the horizon, especially concerning traditional law enforcement and sentencing issues. I am looking, for example, to see if any amici who call Second Amendment rights "fundamental" explain whether and why all felons and some misdemeanants can be severely criminally punished simply for seeking to exercise a fundamental right. Similarly, I wonder if any amici arguments in McDonald might undermine the application of severe mandatory minimum sentencing terms for mere gun possession in certain settings.
Based on a quick scan of who submitted filings, the following briefs caught my eye as potentially worth a close read by those thinking about the possible criminal justice implications of McDonald:
- Amicus Brief by Texas and 37 other states
- Amicus Brief by Professors of Philosophy, Criminology and Law
- Amicus Brief by many California and Nevada DAs
In addition, I notice that at least these two amicus briefs directly engage with the all-important "standard of review" question that has already caused some problems in lower courts:
- Amicus Brief by the Nordyke Plaintiffs (urging SCOTUS to discuss review standards)
- Amicus Brief by the Brady Center(urging SCOTUS to declare "that regulations of firearms are not subject to strict scrutiny, but instead are subject to a deferential, reasonableness standard of review")
By flagging this set of amicus briefs, I do not mean to imply that all the others are not worthy of time and attention. Indeed, as the title of this post is meant to indicate, I am eager to get assistance and insights from others concerning which (if any) of the filings in McDonald are worthy of extended attention.
A few related new and old Second Amendment posts:
- Seventh Circuit gives a little life to Heller challenge to prohibition on DV misdemeanant gun possession
- Should (and will) SCOTUS discuss standards of review for the Second Amendment when deciding incorporation?
- What is the best argument that Heller should only impact the feds? Will it get any votes?
- What state and local issues will be litigated the most if (when?) Heller is incorporated?
- State AGs and the Second Amendment incorporation debate
- "In U.S., Record-Low Support for Stricter Gun Laws"
- What if no lower court judges participate in a "Second Amendment Revolution"?
- Has there been a single pro-gun-rights rulings in lower courts since Heller?
- "Does the Second Amendment Bind the States?"
- What might 2009 have in store for . . . Second Amendment jurisprudence?
November 24, 2009 at 02:30 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Seeking help working though the Second Amendment amicus briefs filed in McDonald: