February 11, 2010
Full Eleventh Circuit still struggling to figure out reasonableness review in Irey caseThe federal appeals courts have now had more than five years to make sense of reasonableness review, the revised approach to federal sentencing appeals created by the Supreme Court in its landmark Booker ruling in January 2005. However, as evidenced by this new piece in the Fulton County Daily Report which is headlined "11th Circuit Appears Split Over Deference in Sentencing," an en banc Eleventh Circuit is still trying to figure out some of the basics of reasonableness review in a horrible sex offender case. Here are the details:
Ideally, en banc decisions by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals give clear direction to lower courts on how to deal with muddled areas of the law. But in Tuesday's en banc argument on criminal sentencing, the 11th Circuit's judges wrestled with which way the court should point.
Pushing to one side were judges who were uncomfortable second-guessing a Florida district court judge who sentenced to 17 1/2 years in prison a man who admitted to recording his sexual abuse of children. On the other side were judges who seemed to agree with prosecutors challenging the sentence as too lenient, given the nature of the crime at issue....
Tuesday's case about William Irey's sentence posed a challenge for the 11th Circuit's effort at providing clarity to sentencing decisions. The circumstances of Irey's case are the sort that give judges difficulty, and many of the judges on Tuesday seemed more interested in the particulars of Irey's case than formulating a uniform approach for sentence review.
Irey, who at one point owned a large construction company, pleaded guilty to a child sex crime that the sentencing judge in Florida described as "horrific." According to prosecutors, Irey sexually abused more than 40 children, some as young as 4 years old. They say he on several occasions traveled to Cambodia where he produced images of himself sexually abusing prepubescent children....
The federal sentencing guidelines, first developed by a congressionally authorized commission in the mid-1980s, counseled U.S. District Judge Gregory A. Presnell of Orlando to sentence Irey to life in prison. But in what is not an unusual conflict between the guidelines and the law, the federal statute criminalizing Irey's conduct said the sentence for the crime should range between 15 and 30 years.
The government asked for the maximum 30 years allowed by the law, but Presnell said he was persuaded by certain factors -- such as Irey's relatively advanced age of 50, and his family's pledge to remain supportive of him -- to give him the lesser sentence of 17 1/2 years. It appeared that a key to Presnell's decision was testimony by Dr. Ted Shaw, the defendant's mental health expert. Shaw testified that pedophilia was "not a disorder that someone chooses" and is treatable. He testified that Irey had been making progress in therapy and, as far as his likelihood to re-offend, was in the "medium low to medium or moderate risk categories."...
Presnell has been an outspoken critic of federal prosecutors' arguments undercutting district judges' discretion on sentencing issues, saying in 2005 that the Department of Justice "wants to be prosecutor and judge." Prosecutors appealed Irey's sentence, saying Presnell relied too heavily on the idea that pedophilia is an illness.
The 11th Circuit panel who heard the government's appeal -- then-Chief Judge J.L. Edmondson, Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat, and Senior Judge James C. Hill -- suggested Presnell's sentence might have been too low. But Edmondson wrote for the panel, "Appellate judges are not authorized to substitute their personal views of what might be the best sentence for the sentence imposed by the district judge."
Hill added his own opinion, saying that he "reluctantly" agreed with the panel. He added, "Had I been given the heavy responsibility of sentencing in this case, my only regret would be that in the halls of Congress, the occupants of that legislative branch place an upward limit on this defendant's confinement."
The 11th Circuit granted a full court rehearing of the case, an unusual act under normal circumstances when the losing side requests en banc review. This move was truly remarkable because prosecutors hadn't requested it....
Related posts on Irey case:
February 11, 2010 at 12:40 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Full Eleventh Circuit still struggling to figure out reasonableness review in Irey case:
The piece fails to note one of the more interesting points made at the argument. The government chose to charge only one count, thus capping his exposure at 30 years. The government chose not to pursue other chsrges that might have carried a higher mandatory minimum. And the government presented no evidence at sentencing and made no objections to the court's findings of fact. Their only objection was that the district court did not give sufficient weight to the seriousness of the offense.
Posted by: defendergirl | Feb 11, 2010 1:50:11 PM
Pushing to one side were judges who were uncomfortable second-guessing a Florida district court judge who sentenced to 17 1/2 years in prison a man who admitted to recording his sexual abuse of children.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | Feb 13, 2010 2:14:20 AM
fulton county is in the US State of Georgia. One can find inmates in the jail in Fulton for Free in this site.
All you need is you should be in USA and you have to search by name. All you need to do is enter the names and select the state as Georgia.
Posted by: fulton county jail inmate search | Dec 19, 2010 8:37:48 AM