« Should showing up for sentencing drunk justify a much tougher sentence? | Main | Coffee, Tea or Milk: will any new "party" seriously engage with criminal justice issues? »

March 14, 2010

Georgia still struggling to pay for death penalty cases old and new

This notable AP report, which is headlined "Georgia public defender system still reeling from Nichols case," highlights the high and tangible costs of (poorly?) administering the death penalty:

Georgia’s public defender system is still trying to recover its financial footing five years after a courthouse gunman racked up a $3 million taxpayer-funded defense tab on the way to his conviction.

The state’s ailing system to defend the poor has struggled almost since its start in 2005, hamstrung not just by the costly Brian Nichols case but also because of the lukewarm support from legislators and a dismal economy.

The state now can’t afford to pay to defend the accused in several capital punishment cases, leaving them waiting in jail for years before their trials start. Some, such as Khan Dinh Phan, have appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court for help. They have asked that their cases be dismissed because the delays violated their right to a speedy trial.

Georgia has faced similar problems before. State legislators created the public defender system precisely because individual counties struggled to provide adequate legal defense for the poor. But prosecutors and defense attorneys say it may take drastic measures to recover from the Nichols’ case, one of the statewide system’s first high-profile tests....

Phan’s attorneys on Tuesday asked the Georgia justices to demand that legislators devote more funding to the system, a $39.8 million program which is facing a $2.4 million cut this fiscal year. Attorney Chris Adams told the court that the lack of funding has turned him into a “potted plant” and a “lawyer in name only.”...

Prosecutors, meanwhile, are in a bind. Gwinnett County District Attorney Danny Porter has called the public defender system “fatally flawed,” and even suggested that the court strike it down as unconstitutional. But he said dismissing Phan’s case is not the solution. “Where is the justice in that?” he said in court documents.

He also said taxpayers should not pay for the public defender council’s “transgressions and the lack of restraint” in deciding that Nichols’ defense outweighed the needs of thousands of other defendants. The state and Fulton County paid more than $900,000 in expert witness fees and more than $1 million in attorney fees.

The system has faced a flurry of other legal challenges, including a lawsuit filed last year that claimed the state was refusing to provide attorneys for dozens of convicted criminals seeking appeals. A Fulton County judge ordered the state last month to pony up funding and provide attorneys for the 100 or so inmates....

Death penalty cases present a particularly prickly problem. They often take months to go to trial even without a budget crisis, and prosecutors and civil rights groups worry that wait times that stretch for years due to funding problems could lead to costly constitutional challenges. “You have to have a lawyer — this is not a negotiable thing,” said Richard Dieter of the Death Penalty Information Center. “These are fundamental constitutional issues, but satisfying them has a ticket, a price that some states can’t afford. They’re cutting police, schools and now they’re reluctant to raise funding for death penalty defense.”

Another flashpoint in the debate involves Jamie Ryan Weis, who faces the death penalty on charges that he killed a Pike County woman during a 2006 burglary. The state has struggled to pay for his defense, and he has had no attorneys to defend him for more than two years.

Weis’ appellate attorney, Stephen Bright, likened his client’s situation to an amateur baseball team taking on a professional one. “You can’t have a death penalty case where one side has all the lawyers, experts and resources, and the other does not,” said Bright. “If you are not willing to pay, don’t pursue it as a capital case.”

March 14, 2010 at 12:40 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201310f9d053c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Georgia still struggling to pay for death penalty cases old and new:

Comments

I suggest a surtax on lawyers making in excess of $100,000. Lawyers created this mess by antic litigation, now they can pay for it.

I think I'm about to get my first hat tip from SC.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Mar 14, 2010 2:43:32 PM

Bill: That is an intelligent solution. It is soft and doable.

However, rent seeking is a synonym for armed robbery. The fees are generated and return no value, not to prevent the false conviction of an innocent defendant (that would be called a profit because it has value to the public). They are spent on procedures and appeals on the law, not on the facts. This is a crime. The judge is the kingpin of this operation. Lawyers will ask for the moon, as it is their duty to provide zealous advocacy. The judge is chief culprit.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Mar 14, 2010 3:45:04 PM

If I recall correctly, Brian Nichols was willing to plead to life. The case went to trial only because the prosecutors wouldn't take that plea. Also, Nichols had killed a state judge in open court, which, again if I recall correctly, is partly why they brought in out-of-state lawyers to defend him. I think those are important facts to throw into the discussion of this case, whatever you might make of them. It wasn't your typical death penalty case (if there could be such a thing), and it certainly wasn't the most auspicious test case for a brand-new public defender system. There was a lengthy Jeffrey Toobin piece in the New Yorker about it a few years ago.

Posted by: Sara Mayeux | Mar 15, 2010 12:17:41 AM

personally i think it should be automatic you have x number of days PERIOD to get someone to trial. you miss that for any reason that cannot be laid at the feeT of the defendant or their lawywer under their order. YOU RELEASE THEM PERIOD.

Case is dismissed with predjuice. no doovers!

Posted by: rodsmith | Mar 15, 2010 12:19:08 AM

even more importantly for each day OVER that number the state must pay a fine to the defendant. NOT their lawyer of a set ammount.

Posted by: rodsmith | Mar 15, 2010 12:20:14 AM

Laws are for the common good.

Posted by: bullet cameras | Feb 17, 2011 9:32:54 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB