« Federal prosecutors asking "only" for 40 years for now-cooperating lawyer Ponzi schemer | Main | Might Elena Kagan be a fan of shaming sanctions? »

June 8, 2010

"Protecting Crime Victims in Federal Appellate Courts"

The title of this post is the first part of the title of former-judge and now Professor Paul Cassell's latest article advocating for the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act to be given a broad reading. This article is available here via SSRN and its full title is "Protecting Crime Victims in Federal Appellate Courts: The Need to Broadly Construe the Crime Victims' Rights Act's Mandamus Provisions."  Here is the start of the piece's abstract:

In 2004, Congress passed the Crime Victims’ Rights Act to dramatically reshape the federal criminal justice system and ensure that crime victims are treated fairly in the criminal process. An important feature of the CVRA is its provisions allowing victims to enforce their rights not only in trial courts, but also in appellate courts. Among the enforcement provisions is one guaranteeing a crime victim expedited access to appellate review. The CVRA provides that if the district court denies any relief sought by a crime victim, the victim “may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. . . . The court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith within 72 hours after the petition has been filed.”

The CVRA’s appellate review provision appeared to provide crime victims the same sort of appellate protections as all other litigants – as several courts of appeals have held in reviewing crime victims’ petitions. Unfortunately, in a recent decision the Tenth Circuit (In re Antrobus) parted company with those other circuits and eviscerated the appellate protections promised to crime victims. In In re Antrobus, the Tenth Circuit rejected carefully reasoned decisions from the Second and Ninth Circuits and held that crime victims could only obtain appellate relief if they show that the district court had made a “clear and indisputable” error. This Article critiques the Tenth Circuit’s Antrobus decision, arguing that the Second and Ninth Circuits (among other circuits) got it right and the Tenth Circuit simply got it wrong.

June 8, 2010 at 02:20 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e2013483885259970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Protecting Crime Victims in Federal Appellate Courts":

Comments

Good articles should share to every person ,hope you can write more and more good articles.

Posted by: p90x workout | Sep 21, 2010 2:05:05 AM

Such kind of article is our need , it can give us help from different aspect for different people . after reading this article , I learn a mount of knowledge increase my power , my families and I all like you article ,reading you article is our best love.

Posted by: monclerjackets | Sep 21, 2010 10:44:08 PM

Thanks for sharing the information there would be some apprehensions from segment but I am up for it.

Posted by: pandora bracelets | Oct 26, 2010 10:52:05 PM

Es ist wirklich eine sehr gute Website, um eine lange Zeit zu finden, sollten Sie bei Sammlungen sehen

Posted by: thomas sabo 2010 | Nov 1, 2010 12:14:06 AM

I see some people walking happily on the square.

Posted by: uggs outlet | Dec 15, 2010 8:44:59 AM

hey buddy,this is one of the best posts that I’ve ever seen; you may include some more ideas in the same theme. I’m still waiting for some interesting thoughts from your side in your next post.

Posted by: Chicago Bears jerseys | Jan 23, 2011 8:33:10 PM

I see some people walking happily on the square.

Posted by: ergo baby carrier sale | Aug 10, 2011 10:33:46 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB