July 16, 2010
Seventh Circuit reinforces importance of adequate sentencing explanations
Two relatively minor rulings from the Seventh Circuit today, US v. Arberry, No. 09-2668 (7th Cir. July 16, 2010) (available here), and US v. Johnson, No. 09-3247 (7th Cir. July 16, 2010) (available here), reinforce a major post-Booker principle that the Seventh Circuit has been particularly good at policing: "that the sentencing court must consider all principal, nonfrivolous arguments," Arberry, slip op. at 2, and that if "the record does not reveal an adequate explanation of the chosen sentence, [the defendant's] sentence must be reversed." Johnson, slip op. at 16.
July 16, 2010 at 02:59 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Seventh Circuit reinforces importance of adequate sentencing explanations: