August 12, 2010
Sixth Circuit decides it lacks jurisdiction to review discretionary decision to deny a sentence reductionThe Sixth Circuit has an interesting little panel decision today in US v. Bowers, No. 08-5595 (6th Cir. Aug. 12, 2010) (available here), which gets started this way:
Although it has been over five years since the Supreme Court’s thoroughgoing reform of federal sentencing law in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a number of open questions remain regarding that decision’s ramifications. In particular, this case requires us to decide Booker’s impactif any on our jurisdiction to hear the appeal from a district court’s decision to reduce (or decline to reduce) a final sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (“§ 3582(c)(2)”) and/or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) (“Rule 35(b)”). Because the Supreme Court has recently clarified that Booker does not apply to such sentence-reduction proceedings, see Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683 (2010), we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to hear a defendant’s appeal of the grant or denial of a sentence reduction pursuant to those sections on Booker “reasonableness” grounds. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
August 12, 2010 at 11:08 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sixth Circuit decides it lacks jurisdiction to review discretionary decision to deny a sentence reduction:
Of course it does.
Posted by: John K | Aug 13, 2010 10:07:43 AM
"Of course it does" lack jurisdiction? Or "of course it does" have jurisdiction? It's far from an obvious question; a prior panel of the Sixth Circuit came to the opposite conclusion (in an opinion that has been vacated). See footnote 11 of this opinion.
Posted by: Max Power | Aug 14, 2010 4:47:16 PM
There is something about women, they like to stand out. If you are looking for an accessory that can make you stand out, then why not go for pearl and leather French designer jewelry? Pearls and leather may sound unconventional but the combination is one of its own kinds.
Posted by: pandora jewellery | Nov 5, 2010 4:08:41 AM