February 2, 2011
"Reducing Mass Incarceration: Lessons from the Deinstitutionalization of Mental Hospitals in the 1960s"
The title of this post is the title of this notable new piece available via SSRN from Professor Bernard Harcourt. Here is the abstract:
In 1963, President Kennedy outlined a federal program designed to reduce by half the number of persons in custody in mental hospitals. What followed was the biggest deinstitutionalization this country has ever seen. The historical record is complex and the contributing factors are several, but one simple fact remains: This country has deinstitutionalized before. As we think about reducing mass incarceration today, it may be useful to recall some lessons from the past.
After tracing the historical background, this essay explores three potential avenues to reduce mass incarceration: First, improving mental health treatment to inmates and exploring the increased use of medication, on a voluntary basis, as an alternative to incarceration; in a similar vein, increasing the use of GPS monitoring and other biometric monitoring, and moving toward the legalization of lesser controlled substances. Second, encouraging federal leadership to create funding incentives for diversionary programs that would give states a financial motive to move prisoners out of the penitentiary and into community-based programs. Third, encouraging impact litigation of prison overcrowding, as well as documentaries of prison life, as a way to influence the public perception of prisoners. With regard to each of these strategies, however, it is crucial to avoid the further racialization of the prison population and merely transferring prisoners to equally problematic institutions.
February 2, 2011 at 09:49 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Reducing Mass Incarceration: Lessons from the Deinstitutionalization of Mental Hospitals in the 1960s":
The street replaced the psychiatric ward in a sylvan setting. Psychotic people slaughtered strangers, killed themselves, and took up residence on the steps of expensive apartment buildings, relieving themselves there. The cost savings in less institutionalization was trivial compared to the consequences. It is not cost reduction. It is cost shifting. Then, the government quietly opened up other institutions, called them something else, and readmitted the chronically ill. These "personal care homes" or these "long term facilities" or these "group homes" look like the old units they replaced.
If there is a lesson learned, it is to not do it.
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Feb 2, 2011 10:13:15 AM