April 25, 2011
Yet another ACCA case before SCOTUS this morning
The second case being argued before the Supreme Court this morning is McNeill v. United States, which is yet another case dealing with the proper application for the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. This SCOTUSblog page (where the briefs can be found) provides this description of the case:
Issue: Whether the plain meaning of the phrase “is prescribed by law,” which the Armed Career Criminal Act uses to define a predicate “serious drug offense,” requires a federal sentencing court to look to the maximum penalty prescribed by current state law for a drug offense at the time of the instant federal offense, regardless of whether the state has made that current sentencing law retroactive.
Plain English Issue: A federal law enhances sentences for certain defendants who have been previously convicted of three or more “serious drug offense[s],” which the statute defines as a drug offense with a maximum sentence of ten or more years. Does the statute require courts to consider the maximum sentence that was on the books when the crime was committed, or at the time of the present sentencing hearing?
UPDATE: The oral argument trancript in McNeill is now available at this link. A quick skim reveals lots of questions for the defense attorney and not much asked of the Assistant SG. It is often not a good sign when one gets a more active bench than one's adversary, but I rarely am inclined to make firm predictions in ACCA cases.
April 25, 2011 at 08:57 AM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yet another ACCA case before SCOTUS this morning: