« "A steep drop in crime, but do you feel safer?" | Main | Sixth Circuit finds substantively unreasonable a one-day of lock-up for child porn downloading »

January 9, 2012

Intriguing sparring partners in SCOTUS comments after denial of cert in Ninth Circuit habeas case

Released today with a relatively uneventful Supreme Court order list are two short opinions in Cash v. Maxwell, a habeas case from the Ninth Circuit in which the Court denied cert review.  Justice Scalia issued this dissent, which Justice Alito joined, concluding this way (emphasis in original):

It is a regrettable reality that some federal judges like to second-guess state courts.  The only way this Court can ensure observance of Congress’s abridgement of their habeas power is to perform the unaccustomed task of reviewing utterly fact-bound decisions that present no disputed issues of law.  We have often not shrunk from that task, which we have found particularly needful with regard to decisions of the Ninth Circuit.  See, e.g., Cavazos v. Smith, 565 U. S. 1 (2011) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for assault on a child resulting in death); Felkner v. Jackson, 562 U. S. ___ (2011) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for sexual attack on a 72-year-old woman); Premo v. Moore, 562 U. S. ___ (2011) (reinstating Oregon conviction for murder of a kidnaped victim); Knowles v. Mirzayance, 556 U. S. 111 (2009) (reinstating California first-degree murder conviction); Rice v. Collins, 546 U. S. 333 (2006) (reinstating California conviction for cocaine possession); Kane v. Garcia Espitia, 546 U. S. 9 (2005) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for carjacking and other offenses); Yarborough v. Gentry, 540 U. S. 1 (2003) (per curiam) (reinstating California conviction for assault with a deadly weapon); Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U. S. 19 (2002) (per curiam) (reinstating capital sentence for California prisoner convicted of first-degree murder, attempted murder, and armed robbery).  Today we have shrunk, letting stand a judgment that once again deprives California courts of that control over the State’s administration of criminal justice which federal law assures.  We should grant the petition for certiorari and summarily reverse the Ninth Circuit’s latest unsupportable §2254 judgment.

Justice Sotomayor responds with this opinion ending this way (footnote omitted):

Here, the Ninth Circuit recognized that 28 U. S. C. §2254(d)(2) imposes a “daunting standard — one that will be satisfied in relatively few cases.”  628 F. 3d, at 500 (internal quotation marks omitted). The court below found that standard met only after describing, in scrupulous detail, the overwhelming evidence supporting the conclusion that Storch falsely testified at Maxwell’s trial — attempting to manipulate the integrity of the judicial system as he did in numerous other cases.  I agree with the Ninth Circuit’s determination. But even to the extent that the dissent sees error in that determination, the Ninth Circuit conducted precisely the inquiry required by §2254(d)(2) and our precedents.  “The principal purpose of this Court’s exercise of its certiorari jurisdiction is to clarify the law.” Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U. S. 868, 902 (2009) (SCALIA, J., dissenting). Mere disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s highly factbound conclusion is, in my opinion, an insufficient basis for granting certiorari.  See this Court’s Rule 10.

This little spitting match over a Ninth Circuit habeas grant is not only intriguing on the merits, but also notable for who keeps their tinder dry.  I am a bit surprised to see that Justice Thomas is not joining in Justice Scalia's opinion; it also seems interesting that Justice Sotomayor is a lone voice defending the work of the Ninth Circuit in this case.

January 9, 2012 at 11:10 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e20168e53efd90970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Intriguing sparring partners in SCOTUS comments after denial of cert in Ninth Circuit habeas case:

Comments

"it also seems interesting that Justice Sotomayor is a lone voice defending the work of the Ninth Circuit in this case."

Some Justices are more prone than others to write opinions when they agree with a denial of certiorari. Justice Stevens used to write a lot of them, but he's gone. I wouldn't read much, if anything, into the fact that the other justices agreeing not to take the case neither joined Sotomayor's opinion nor wrote their own.

Justice Thomas's decision not to join the dissent may have some meaning, since he does join or write these dissents occasionally.

I suspect that the fact this case arises from the L.A. jailhouse informant scandal swayed the requisite number of votes to deny certiorari. The Court probably does not want to reinstate a conviction having anything to do with that mess, but they couldn't really affirm either, as Justice Scalia explains, so they just leave it in the 99% cert-denied pile.

Posted by: Kent Scheidegger | Jan 9, 2012 1:40:52 PM


Decades ago (14 November 1956), Mr. Justice Frankfurter, in a memorandum on an Ohio case, wrote [DJB's emphasis]:

"Such a denial of his petition in no wise implies that this Court approves the decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio. It means and means only that for one reason or another this case did not commend itself to at least four members of the Court as falling within those considerations which should lead this Court to exercise its discretion in reviewing a lower court's decision. * * *" Sheppard v. Ohio, 352 U.S. 910, 911, 77 S.Ct. 118, 119, 1 L.Ed.2d 119 (1956).

History addicts can find more at
Famous Trials by [Professor] Douglas O. Linder (2011) - UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITY (UMKC) SCHOOL OF LAW:
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/sheppard/samsheppardtrial.html

Famous Trials
Dr. Sam Sheppard Trials 1954 and 1966

Posted by: Docile Jim Brady | Jan 10, 2012 8:10:35 AM

No member of the three-judge panel in the 9th Circuit dissented from the grant of habeas relief.

And, as noted in the 9th Circuit's decision, the informant who testified against the petitioner in this case was eventually indicted for perjury for testifying falsely about getting a deal for snitching on the petitioner. 628 F.3d at 503. The petitioner's "conviction was based in large measure" on the snitch's testimony. Id. at 498. The snitch "perjured himself multiple times" at the petitioner's trial. Id. at 503.

It does not seem like a wildly irrational grant of habeas relief.

Posted by: Calif. Capital Defense Counsel | Jan 10, 2012 6:03:07 PM

"It does not seem like a wildly irrational grant of habeas relief."

Correct. But it does seem like a lawless one. The Brady claims are BS. As for the perjury claims, well, the problem is burden of proof and the state court's conclusion that Maxwell had not met it. The issue is not, as Sotomayor seems to think, whether on a clean slate one should conclude that Storch committed perjury, but whether the state court unreasonably concluded that Maxwell had not carried his burden of demonstrating falsity.

Basically, this is one of those situations where the habeas court is bending the rules to come at what appears to it to be justice. I guess the reality is that we have to live with that sometimes, and truth to be told, the use of Storch is clearly a problem. But where the rules are bent for the clearly guilty, the Supreme Court has to be willing to drop the hammer in a big way.

Let's hope that (assuming they got the right guy) Maxwell has been rehabilitated and leads a law-abiding life upon his (likely) release.

Posted by: federalist | Jan 11, 2012 2:40:24 PM

Beats By Dre USCarmelo Anthony From the New York KnicksCheap Beats By DreKobe Bryant From the Los Angeles LakersBeats By Dre SaleLeBron James From the Miami HeatBeats By Dre HeadphonesDwyane Wade From the Miami Heatdr dre headphonesTracy McGrady From the Atlanta Hawksbeats by dr dre headphonesYao Ming From the Houston Rocketsdr dre studio headphonesYi Jianlian From the Washington Wizardsbeats by dr dre pro headphonesChris Paul From the Los Angeles Clippersbeats by dr dre solo HDKevin Durant From the Oklahoma City Thundernew style beats by dr dreDirk Nowitzki From the Dallas MavericksCasque Dr DreJason Kidd From the Dallas MavericksBeats By DreTim Duncan From the San Antonio SpursCasque Monster BeatsDeron Williams From the New Jersey NetsDr.Dre OutletDwight Howard From the Orlando Magiccasque dr dre beatsKevin Garnett From the Boston Celticscasques beats by dre studioPaul Pierce From the Boston Celticscasque beats by dr dre proRay Allen From the Boston Celticscasque beats by dr dre solo HDDerrick Rose From the Chicago Bullscasque dr dre beatsLuis Scola From the Houston Rocketscasque beats by dreKevin Lowry From the Houston Rocketsfrance beats by dreChuck Hayes From the Sacramento kingsbeats by dreAllen Iverson 76 people from Philadelphiadr dre casqueAllen Brooks From the Phoenix Sunscasque beats by dr dreCarl Landry From the New Orleans Hornetscasque beats studioSteve Nash From the Phoenix Sunscasque beats proTony Parker From the San Antonio Spurscasque beats soloManu Ginobili From the San Antonio Spurscasques dr dre solo HDMarc Gasol From the Memphis GrizzliesBeats By Dre AustraliaPau Gasol From the Los Angeles LakersBeats By Dr DreLol Deng From the Chicago BullsDr Dre BeatsDanny Granger From the Indiana pacersDr Dre HeadphonesRussell Westbrook From the Oklahoma City ThunderAustralia beats by dre headphonesLaMarcus Aldridge From the Portland Trail BlazersAustralia beats studioRudy Gay From the Memphis Grizzliesbeats by dre pro headphonsMike Conley From the Memphis Grizzliesdr dre solo HDZach Randolph From the Memphis GrizzliesBeats By Dr DreKevin Martin From the Houston RocketsBeats By Dre AustraliaCourtney Lee From the Houston RocketsBeats By Dre HeadphonesLamar Odom From the Dallas MavericksDr Dre Headphones AustraliaShawn Marion From the Dallas MavericksBeats By Dre HeadphonesRudy Fernandez From the Dallas MavericksBeats By Dr Dre Studio HeadphonesRichard Jefferson From the San Antonio SpursBeats By Dr Dre Pro HeadphonesRajon Rondo From the Boston CelticsBeats By Dr Dre Solo HeadphonesJermaine ONeal From the Boston CelticsBeats By Dr Dre Solo HD HeadphonesAmare Stoudemire From the New York Knicksdr dre beats HeadphonesChauncey Billups From the Los Angeles ClippersBeats By Dre UKElton Brand 76 people from PhiladelphiaDiscount Beats By Dr DreAndre Iguodala 76 people from PhiladelphiaDr Dre Headphones UKEvan Turner 76 people from PhiladelphiaBeats By Dre Online StoreAntawn Jamison From the Cleveland Cavaliersbeats by dreKyrie Irving From the Cleveland Cavaliersdre beats headphonesRashard Lewis From the Washington Wizards New Arrival Beats By Dr DreAndray Blatche From the Washington WizardsBeats By Dr StudioJohn Wall From the Washington Wizardsdr dre Studio headphonesJaVale McGee From the Washington WizardsBeats By Dr Dre ProJosh Howard From the Washington WizardsBeats Pro HeadphonesGilbert Arenas From the Orlando Magicbeats by dre soloHedo Turkoglu From the Orlando Magicbeats by dre solo HDJoe Johnson From the Atlanta Hawksbeats solo HD headphonesJosh Smith From the Atlanta Hawksjustbeats headphonesAl Horford From the Atlanta Hawksdiscount beats headphonesDavid Lee From the Golden State Warriorscanada gooseMonta Ellis From the Golden State Warriorscanada goose ukMarcus Camby From the Portland Trail Blazerscanada goose parkaGerald Wallace From the Portland Trail Blazerscanada goose outletRaymond Felton From the Portland Trail Blazerscanada goose jacketsJonny Flynn From the Houston Rockets

Posted by: Beats By Dre | Feb 2, 2012 3:54:35 AM

This can give you the flexibility of stopping over in the hub city for no additional cost.

Posted by: hawaii helicopter tours | Apr 30, 2012 12:05:12 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB