« "Prison Officials Go After Masturbating Prisoners" | Main | "Life Without Parole Is A Terrible Idea" »

April 28, 2012

Unusual (but justified) three-strikes 25-to-life sentence for repeat California fraudster

This Los Angeles Times article, headlined "Housing scam brings up to life sentence under three-strikes law," reports on an unusual (but arguably justified) long state prison term for a repeat fraudster.  Here are the details:

An Orange County man who swindled elderly people out of their homes after promising to help them avoid foreclosure was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison under California's tough three-strikes law.  Defense lawyers and prosecutors across the state could not recall any other case in which a white-collar offender received such a lengthy sentence under a statute typically applied in violent crime cases.

The sentencing of Timothy Barnett was unusual because his entire criminal record involved fraud.  The 49-year-old was convicted last month of 17 felonies for tricking five people into unknowingly granting him title to their homes.  He had been convicted of similar charges in the 1990s.

"The worst thing you can do is take somebody's home," Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Stephen A. Marcus said Friday in explaining the lengthy sentence.  "Instead of helping people, he stripped the equity from their homes and left five people homeless," the judge said. "Even Bernie Madoff didn't take people's homes from them."

Defense attorney Amy Konstantelos had urged the judge to impose a lesser sentence, noting that Barnett had never been convicted of a violent crime. "Three strikes should never be used in a case like this," she said after the sentencing in Los Angeles. "It's another reason the law should be amended." Konstantelos said she intended to file an appeal.

Barnett's latest crimes occurred between 2005 and 2007.  The victims were older residents of poor South Los Angeles communities who had used the explosion of real estate values to borrow against their equity, only to fall behind on the payments.  That's when Barnett appeared.  Victims testified that he went to their homes and prayed with them, saying he could help keep their homes, bring loans current and reduce monthly payments. What Barnett didn't make clear enough was that he would end up owning the homes, Marcus said. Along with their homes, the victims cumulatively lost nearly $900,000 of equity to Barnett....

Many people across the country have been accused of victimizing desperate homeowners since the real estate market collapsed in 2008, without facing a potential life sentence. What set Barnett's case apart was two prior "strikes" he received after pleading guilty to two burglary charges in the 1990s. That made him eligible for a life sentence if convicted of a new felony, as he was in March....

[Deputy Dist. Atty. Robert] Knowles, the prosecutor, said he was pleased with the sentence. "I think it's appropriate, given the facts of the case and the purpose of the three-strikes law, which is to protect citizens from recidivist offenders," Knowles said.

April 28, 2012 at 10:12 PM | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unusual (but justified) three-strikes 25-to-life sentence for repeat California fraudster:



"The 49-year-old was convicted last month of 17 felonies for tricking five people into unknowingly granting him title to their homes. He had been convicted of similar charges in the 1990s."

Looks like the crooked little shit did not learn from his mistake. so good riddence to bad rubbish!

Posted by: rodsmith | Apr 28, 2012 11:04:13 PM

rodsmith nails it.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Apr 29, 2012 9:50:19 AM

LOL thanks bill. Like i've alwasy said i have no problem with giving almost anyone a chance to make a mistake and learn from that mistake and move on with no continual after the fact punishment. But SCREW UP AGAIN and i have no problem locking you up and losing the keys either!

Posted by: rodsmith | Apr 29, 2012 6:43:15 PM

Well, it is not exactly a good time to be guilty of this sort of thing. Many "crooked little shits" are getting little or nothing for what they are doing.

Posted by: Joe | Apr 30, 2012 12:14:53 PM

oh i agree with you joe. You only have to look at wall street and washington and most state capitals to know that!

But like that old saying.

You GOT to START somewhere!

and i STILL hate this damn captcha crap!

Posted by: rodsmith | Apr 30, 2012 1:19:22 PM

Anyone who did a crime should find herself/himself in the prison.!

Posted by: Tom Henry | May 27, 2012 7:40:25 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB