« Proof of prohibition's failings?: teens now smoke pot more than tobacco | Main | Ninth Circuit panel grants injunction to enable media to witness full Idaho execution »

June 8, 2012

"Restoring Responsibility: Promoting Justice, Therapy and Reform Through Direct Brain Interventions"

The title of this post is the title of this piece now available via SSRN authored by Nicole A. Vincent. Here is the abstract:

Direct brain intervention based mental capacity restoration techniques -- for instance, psycho-active drugs -- are sometimes used in criminal cases to promote the aims of justice. For instance, they might be used to restore a person’s competence to stand trial in order to assess the degree of their responsibility for what they did, or to restore their competence for punishment so that we can hold them responsible for it.  Some also suggest that such interventions might be used for therapy or reform in criminal legal contexts -- i.e. to make non-responsible and irresponsible people more responsible.

However, I argue that such interventions may at least sometimes fail to promote these responsibility-related legal aims.  This is because responsibility hinges on other factors than just what mental capacities a person has -- in particular, it also hinges on such things as authenticity, personal identity, and mental capacity ownership -- and some ways of restoring mental capacity may adversely affect these other factors.  Put one way, my claim is that what might suffice for the restoration of competence need not necessarily suffice for the restoration of responsibility, or, put another way, that although responsibility indeed tracks mental capacity it may not always track restored mental capacities.

June 8, 2012 at 10:14 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e201630646d7fb970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Restoring Responsibility: Promoting Justice, Therapy and Reform Through Direct Brain Interventions":

Comments

Under 123D, it is up to the criminal to use available technology, or to not use it, and speed up the count.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Jun 9, 2012 3:05:55 AM

works for me too SC as long as it also applies to politicians! Pass 3 laws the courts then rule illegal and we get to SHOOT YOU!

Posted by: rodsmith | Jun 9, 2012 1:53:49 PM

Im not sure in what to think about this one drugs to to promote the aims of justice not sure if thats a good idea

Posted by: dildo | Aug 3, 2012 7:15:42 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB