September 8, 2012
"Retribution as Revenge and Retribution as Just Deserts"The title of this post is the title of this interesting looking new article now up at SSRN authored by Monica Gerber and Jonathan Jackson. Here is the abstract:
Public attitudes towards law-breakers shape the tone and tenor of crime-control policy. The desire for retribution seems to be the main motivation underpinning punitive attitudes towards sentencing, yet there is some confusion in the research literature over what retribution really means. In this paper we distinguish between retribution as revenge (as the desire to punish criminal offenders to retaliate a past wrong by making the offender suffer) and retribution as just deserts (as the preference to restore justice through proportional compensation from the offender).
Results from an online survey (n=176) provide evidence of two distinct dimensions of retribution, but we also show that these two dimensions have different ideological and motivational antecedents, and have different consequences in terms of the treatment of criminal offender. We find that retribution as revenge is associated with the motivation to enforce status boundaries with criminal offenders, as well as ideological preferences for power and dominance (as expressed by social dominance orientation) and in-group conformity (as expressed by right-wing authoritarianism). Endorsement of retribution as revenge also predicts the support of harsh punishment and the willingness to deny fair procedures. By contrast, retribution as just deserts is mainly predicted by a value restoration motive and by right-wing authoritarianism. After controlling for revenge, retribution as just deserts predicts support for procedural justice in the criminal courts. We conclude with the idea that beliefs about proportionality and compensation work as a buffer against the negative effects of revenge.
September 8, 2012 at 12:22 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Retribution as Revenge and Retribution as Just Deserts":
How idiotic is this claptrap? Right-wing = authoritarian? I am as right-wing as they come, and authoritarianism makes me sick. Why is there such a lobby to be nice to criminals?
I don;t get it---why is it hard to understand that people can simply think that violent criminals need to be harshly punished?
Posted by: federalist | Sep 8, 2012 3:31:31 PM
federalist: I don't think you could understand.
Posted by: dana | Sep 9, 2012 2:21:54 PM