« California Supreme Court details restrictions on successive habeas filings | Main | Interesting report on how Florida prosecutor approaches Graham and Miller »

September 3, 2012

"The GOP platform’s surprisingly progressive stance on crime"

The title of this post is the headline of this astute recent Washington Post piece.  Here are excerpts:

Four years ago, Republicans devoted a section in their platform to the War on Drugs, lamenting the “human toll of drug addiction and abuse” and vowing to “continue the fight against producers, traffickers, and distributor of illegal substances.”

That plank is conspicuously missing from the GOP platform this year.  The fight against illegal drugs is only mentioned in passing, mostly with reference to drug cartels and the ban on using controlled substances for doctor-assisted suicide.

Policy experts agree that the omission is significant.  “This is less a ‘tough on crime’ document than you would have expected.  And leaving out the War on Drugs [is] quite astounding,” says Mark Kleiman, a crime policy expert and professor at UCLA.  “It’s a bit more of a libertarian attitude,” says Marc Levin, who runs a conservative criminal justice reform project called “Right on Crime” that’s attracted the support of Newt Gingrich and Grover Norquist.

What’s more, the 2012 platform includes new provisions that emphasize the importance of rehabilitation and re-entry programs to help ex-prisoners integrate back into society — using language that Kleiman describes as “a lot less ‘lock ‘em up and throw away the key.’”

“While getting criminals off the street is essential, more attention must be paid to the process of restoring those individuals to the community,” the platform says.  “Prisons should do more than punish; they should attempt to rehabilitate and institute proven prisoner reentry systems to reduce recidivism and future victimization.”  The document also criticizes the “overcriminalization of behavior,” though it doesn’t elaborate on the point much further.

Both Kleiman and Levin believe it’s partly the outgrowth of a prison-reform push on the part of GOP governors whose state budgets have been saddled with high incarceration expenses.  In recent months, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, and Gov. Chris Christie have embraced crime reform legislation to support the kind of rehabilitation programs that the GOP platform now advocates, with some also reducing jail time for non-violent offenders....

To be sure, there are still some aggressively “law-and-order” provisions in the platform, some of which go farther than the 2008 version.  The previous platform called for mandatory sentences for “gang conspiracy crimes, violent or sexual offenses against children, rape, and assaults resulting in serious bodily injury.”  This year, the provision has been expanded to include all “gang crimes, repeat drug dealers, robbery, and murder.”

But overall, the platform reveals a notable policy shift for the GOP, although it’s hasn’t been one that either side has mentioned much in this year’s election.

Some recent and older related posts:

September 3, 2012 at 08:43 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e2017d3bd09032970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "The GOP platform’s surprisingly progressive stance on crime":

Comments

Party affiliation does not matter. We know that from Supreme Court decisions. We know the lawyer runs policy making for both parties. The primary loyalty of the lawyer is to the criminal cult enterprise (CCE). That comes before loyalty to nation, family, or even self.

When you lower crime, you lose lawyer jobs and shrink government, a wholly owned subsidiary of the CCE.

Thus these soft on crime proposals from a conservative party.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Sep 3, 2012 9:11:44 PM

I think I'll take my cue on what the platform means from Romney and Ryan, rather than Kleiman and Levin.

As to some parts, though, there's nothing controversial. Of course prisons should do more than punish (although they should do that too). Almost all inmates will be back on the street, so best to give them a good shot at living productively. But there too, the key to their doing that is their wanting to do it, not how many government programs they can milk.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Sep 3, 2012 10:02:59 PM

All successful rehab programs are overloaded with old prisoners. They would do better on the outside even without the program. Crime burns out with age.

Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Sep 3, 2012 11:50:32 PM

Dagnabit, Bill!!

Why in the world ya'd wanna join the GOP platform dive on crime is an agreiveous mystery to me. They all tryin' ta fix the budget with this prison reform nonsense instead of putting there mouths where there money is.

What we need is true prison stimulus - investing big dollars in prisons and getting more prisoners for them to accomplish eeconomy of scale. As long as we cut back here, cut back there, there won't be any prisons left to imprisonate anyone. All the potential prisoners will end up runnin' around loose on blogs.

Posted by: Al Ammo | Sep 4, 2012 7:51:08 AM

I still think we should execute everyone put forward from BOTH sides and then leave the positions empty for one cycle and start over then with new candicates who have NEVER been in politics before.

Posted by: rodsmith | Sep 4, 2012 9:55:45 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB