October 30, 2012
"A Theory of Criminal Victimization"The title of this post is the title of this intriguing new paper by Joshua Kleinfeld now available via SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Criminal punishment is systematically harsher, given a fixed crime, where victims are vulnerable or innocent, and systematically less harsh where victims are powerful or culpable. We make a distinction between one gangster attacking another and a gangster attacking a bystander (though the assaults might be formally identical), or between selling drugs to an adult and selling them to a child (though the penal code might treat the two as the same). Yet this pattern in blame and punishment has been overlooked. Criminal scholarship and moral philosophy have offered no theory by which to explain it. And, lacking a theory, the pattern itself has been missed or misunderstood empirically.
This Article sets forth the concept of “victimization” — the idea that the moral status of a wrongful act turns in part on the degree to which the wrong’s victim is vulnerable or innocent and the wrongdoer preys upon that vulnerability or innocence. It shows the concept to be implicit in both the doctrine and practice of criminal law. And it argues normatively that victimization is at the same time essential to criminal justice and peculiarly prone to illiberal distortions, and should therefore be at once preserved and constrained.
A concluding section reflects methodologically on the paper’s approach to moral philosophy in law — an approach in which the law is not just a tool with which to implement the conclusions of an extralegal philosophical inquiry, but an object of study with a certain immanent moral content already in place, which philosophy can help bring to light and expose to question.
October 30, 2012 at 05:46 PM | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "A Theory of Criminal Victimization":
"Yet this pattern in blame and punishment has been overlooked. Criminal scholarship and moral philosophy have offered no theory by which to explain it."
I'm no fancy law professor type, but maybe because it's so obvious that it doesn't need to be said.
Posted by: fancyme | Oct 30, 2012 9:01:17 PM
Disparity in punishment by victim type reflects bias, and is unfair. So wghistle at a white trash girl, get hanged.Lynch ablack rich guy in front of hundreds, get a bonus from the lawyer seizing his assets.
Beat up a blond girl, getyour face onTV and the full book.Beat a black male her age, the police does not even show up.
Kill a white, you get the death penalty. Kill a blak male, get a few years.
Posted by: Supremacy Claus | Oct 31, 2012 12:07:15 AM