« Great symposium at Washington & Lee on Gideon a half-century later | Main | A few criminal justice headlines on Election Eve »

November 4, 2012

"Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process: Prosecutors, Judges, and the Effects of United States v. Booker"

The title of this post is the title of this notable new empirical paper by Professors Sonja Starr and M. Marit Rehavi now available via SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Current empirical estimates of racial and other unwarranted disparities in sentencing suffer from two pervasive flaws.  The first is a focus on the sentencing stage in isolation. Studies control for the “presumptive sentence” or closely related measures that are themselves the product of discretionary charging, plea-bargaining, and fact-finding processes.  Any disparities in these earlier processes are built into the control variable, which leads to misleading sentencing-disparity estimates.  The second problem is specific to studies of sentencing reforms: they use loose methods of causal inference that do not disentangle the effects of reform from surrounding events and trends.

This Article explains these problems and presents an analysis that corrects them and reaches very different results from the existing literature.  We address the first problem by using a dataset that traces cases from arrest to sentencing and by examining disparities across all post-arrest stages.  We find that most of the otherwise-unexplained racial disparities in sentencing can be explained by prosecutors’ choices to bring mandatory minimum charges.  We address the problem of disentangling trends using a rigorous method called regression discontinuity design.  We apply it to assess the effects of the loosening of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Booker.  Contrary to prominent recent studies, we find that Booker did not increase disparity, and may have reduced it.

November 4, 2012 at 09:12 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451574769e2017c331c47eb970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice Process: Prosecutors, Judges, and the Effects of United States v. Booker":

Comments

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2012/11/fletcher-named-ali-reporter-of-american-indian-law.html#comments

Posted by: arnoldzoee | Nov 6, 2012 4:16:47 AM

What is criminal justice administration? The dictionary defines it as the system of law enforcement, involving police, lawyers, courts, and corrections, used for all stages of criminal proceedings and punishment. This seems a little contradictory with the racial disparity issue. There should be equality, freedom, and fairness granted to everyone! I hate our justice system sometimes, it just isn't consistent with it's beliefs.

Posted by: Mike Cornelia | Nov 15, 2012 10:34:48 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB